neophyte321
Guest
Quote from monistat7:
i have never heard liberals or anyone say they want MORE voting fraud. i have heard neocons on TV saying they think it is okay to pollute all they want. i debate with guys in my gym that vote republican and think only liberal pussies should care about a clean environment and that the earth can handle all the pollution we produce. i am not saying everyone against global warming is pro-pollution but there certainly are a number of regular folks out there who want to be free to pollute as much as they want and any restrictions on pollution is a liberal cause.
I'm having a Don Imus moment, my apologies for my mocking attitude. Sometimes I can relieve a days worth of frustration in a few choice words.
Ours is a remarkably clean environment if you consider that we are not very far removed from the beginning of the industrial age. I live in a megalopolises, with a temporary three hour commute. I spend the drive-time counting wild turkeys, deer, cranes, hawks, etc ...
Anybody who takes a moments time to contemplate their own morality wants a clean environment and is willing to make sacrifices to make that happen, the question is at what cost? It's basic economics, there is a point where the cost of reducing pollution exceeds the benefits from reducing it. As technology advances the costs of reducing it drop precipitously.
Any fool can proclaim, "I Want A Clean Environment!", and only a complete fool would say "I don't care if the environment is clean!". I'll fully agree, there are many bone-headed young republicans completely wrong on this issue, and even more liberals completely irrational and unrealistic about it.
I'm on record as equating global warming with the loch-ness monster, as I sit and wait for a foot of April snow, I think I'm safe. I'm obviously not an expert, and this is my last comment on this very tedious topic. By the way, CO2 is not pollution.
