
Quote from ess1096:
Sorry, but those "trendlines" are not drawn properly. They seem to be placed where you wish them to be. And are they semi-log charts or linear????
I don't have time now but I'll post the proper trendlines for the indexes soon.
Quote from ess1096:
Well the 2000 high seemed to be significant in 2007. An almost perfect double top.........7 YEARS APART.
You don't have to believe it. Just have an open mind.
Quote from Pa(b)st Prime:
I did very, very well from Oct/07-Jan/08 using a fractal from the 1998 LTCM debacle.....
Quote from Jesse Livermore:
"Wall Street never changes, the pockets change, the stocks change, but Wall Street never changes, because human nature never changes."
Quote from Pa(b)st Prime:
Our work is similar. I recently posted here that out of the dozen or so people I've shared my stuff with in the past few years only 2 expressed any continued interest.
Weirdly they were two of my smarter friends. Without doubt the market is cycle/fib/measured driven and violations of the "playbook" provide follow through.
Shortie: I get your point but yea sometimes you just need to suspend logic. After all the Dow found resistance at around 1000 perhaps a dozen times in a 17 year period. Different components, 5 different Presidents etc......

Quote from Random.Capital:
If the Y2K high is significant, why did only one of the several widely followed US indices stop near it? Nasdaq, Dow, Russell...all had '07 tops a long long way from the '00 tops.
Not asking that you believe it - just keep an open mind.
![]()