Muslim Suffers Bruised Ego in Fort Hood Tragedy

drjekyllus · Nov 13, 2009

Quote from Mom0/pH0x:

oh do i? tell me, what exactly is "jewish behavior"?

I wouldn't worry about Ricter too much. He blames the jews for his status as a loser in life. Its common pratice amongst libs. Blame everyone else for your own shortcomings.

Ricter · Nov 13, 2009

Quote from drjekyllus:

I wouldn't worry about Ricter too much. He blames the jews for his status as a loser in life. Its common pratice amongst libs. Blame everyone else for your own shortcomings.

*shrug*, you call everyone who does not share your political views "loser".

Ricter · Nov 13, 2009

Quote from Tigerjaw:

If, just for the sake of argument, - what you say is true - - - so how would you know that this ZZZzzz person is the same individual ?

That's easy. No one else on this board is so doggedly "gotta have the last word" as optionalzzzzzz.

Lucrum · Nov 13, 2009

Quote from Tigerjaw:

...so how would you know that this ZZZzzz person is the same individual ?

Trust me...it is.

murray t turtle · Nov 13, 2009

Quote from Mav88:

I'm not a Coulter fan, but I agree with her assesment. The guy was not overworked or overstressed, in fact he was sent to Hood because he was a lazy underperformer. The media though jumped to the PTS conclusion in order to avoid the now very obvious, but politically incorrect, conclusion that this had religious motivations.

The Chairman of the joint chiefs said it would be a larger tragedy if we let this affect diversity in the Army.... really??? Diversity is more important than people getting shot up? Well then how about letting the skinheads in for diversities sake? How about the Nazis and Communists, why we should let them have a say for diversity's sake

=====================
I see a a certain amount of logic in ABC,CBS,NBC blaming it on ''stress''. If they were actually to admit that terrorists/radical muslims have declared war on USA / Israel-oops,then President Reagan/ President Bush/President Barak would be right to fight.

As Charles Krauthammer, hammered home the point,on FOX;
PC is a moral abomination & a danger.
Spell checker not used.

cleveland45 · Nov 13, 2009

PC never was legitimate, and hopefully people will start to wake up and realize it.

Tigerjaw · Nov 13, 2009

Quote from Lucrum:

Trust me...it is.

OPTIONAL and I are usually on the opposite sides of an argument (despite his protests to the contrary most of his posts IMO are partisan Dem, and I am an independent) - but I would never just 'trust' someone's character assasination of another poster on this website.

cleveland45 · Nov 13, 2009

Quote from Tigerjaw:

OPTIONAL and I are usually on the opposite side of an argument (despite his protests to the contrary most of his posts are partisan Dem, and I am an independent) - but I would never just 'trust' someone's character assasination of another poster on this website.

Especially since this is the internet, where assumptions can often be false.

But we can hate each other's guts in the meantime.

Ricter · Nov 13, 2009

Quote from cleveland45:

PC never was legitimate, and hopefully people will start to wake up and realize it.

PC was legitimate, back when it was a tool in the battle to end discrimination based on superficial attributes. That it has morphed into something more sinister speaks to the nature of Man more than it does to its legitimacy.

Index piker · Nov 13, 2009

Quote from Tigerjaw:

OPTIONAL and I are usually on the opposite sides of an argument (despite his protests to the contrary most of his posts IMO are partisan Dem, and I am an independent) - but I would never just 'trust' someone's character assasination of another poster on this website.

My question is: If they both act the same does it matter?

same idiocy 2 bodies vs same idiocy 2 Id's.

I fail to see the significance for the reader.