Quote from I am...:
Once again, you are mistrepresenting my position on what is reality. You are beginning to mimic the way NT scribes misrepresented Jesus' position on what is reality. It's almost as if you have the same agenda.
Just because I don't recognize your world of time/mass as real/reality, you say that I don't believe in any reality whatsoever. You assume time/mass is reality. You believe it is real. I don't. Neither did Jesus. You assassinate my position on reality. NT scribes assassinated Jesus' position on reality.
It was easier back then to burn a legacy and block communication. It's harder today, what with the internet and the way words persist despite efforts to misrepresent. If you took away time/mass, reality would persist in the way it always has, in spite of time/mass scenarios...in a way that is beyond the imagination of those who believe in time/mass as "reality".
Iam, you are using the same "time/ mass" reality as I do, as everyone does, to believe that "time/mass" reality, is not reality. It's self-contradictory and a dishonest representation.
You stated your belief and you can believe reality is not reality all you want, but trying to accuse me of misrepresenting your position because you are trying to circumvent reality , usually with all kinds of elaborate hippy talk, is just plain wrong of you.
Also I donât think it helps substantiate your belief to put words into the mouth of the fictional Jesus (
"You believe it is real. I don't. Neither did Jesus." ) , in the same way you accuse Christians of doing. Nor
tell me - what I believe. So hypocritical !
You haven't answered my question so would you kindly respond directly to it.
This is nothing to do with what I believe or don't believe . Still trying to blame me for what Christians believe are Jesus's words, is petty and ridiculous.
I've put forward what millions of Christians state they believe to be the words and teachings of Jesus Christ sent by God Almighty, in the form of the New Testament. Absurd as that is , NT is accepted by them to be what Jesus taught.
Irrespective of any belief, some of those teachings of Jesus are obviously despicable. That is my argument.
You are the one saying they are not his words.
So my question remains , opposed to all those Christians and the NT , what do you say are his words, where if not the from the NT ,did Jesus's teachings come to be whatever they are?
Are some of them , if they even exist in reality at all, as morally reprehensible as some of Christ's words in the NT?
Were they so, I would respond in same to you , as I do to those Christians who conveniently ignore reality by re-interpreting some deplorable teachings of Jesus into anything but what they are . Just like you re-interpret reality into your own reality of unreality.
Moreover, if you hadn't heard of Jesus Christ in the New Testament or from some Christian parroting any number of preposterous re-interpretations of it, where the hell would you ever come to know about that specific character in the first place ?
I think you should be a little more honest about this stuff, despite your beliefs.
