MurreyMath

Quote from OPTIONAL777:



I can make up a chart to make myself look good too. Big deal.

You had a chance to prove your system's superiority, and you failed.

You made a challenge to surf to where MSFT would go, you claimed to 56 & change, +/- .$39, and surf predicted $51.26 before it got to your target.

Who was right? You or surf? Who met their targets first? He hit his within a penny....it wasn't until today that MSFT hit your target.

You see, surf is professional enough not to bring it up, the fact that he proved his system was superior when it came to a prediction in MSFT. Why? He really has nothing to prove. Those of who have been watching surf call the market, day in and day out for the past many years know his system works, yet he doesn't claim it to be the best, or superior to other systems. He remains humble, not a egotistical paper trader like you come off to be.

I am not a professional trader, don't claim to be, don't want to be, I do what works for me that is plenty. I would just prefer to point out that people like you are blowhards, making claims you don't prove, claiming your system is better than others....nonsense.

You are a paper trader, until proven differently.
More...

OOOOOOO.....optional has declared me a PAPER trader! OH HORROR of HORRORS!!!

Optional, is thick, he thinks I have something to prove, rather than to share.

Optional still thinks the world is flat.

Well, in a way, he is right, I do get plenty of paper!

Of course, nobody win all of their trades, but I win enough of them.

Optional can watch me buy some options with IBM. Store that IBM chart, now!

Study Prof. Murrey's system too!
 
Quote from oddiduro:
...why I don't bother with the S&P, although I do pay for the S&P emini data...The spx example was simply meant to show that MM will work on absolutely anything.
More...

OK, I was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt initially, but you've lost me.

If you don't "bother" with the S&P as you've suddenly asserted, why the heck are you pretending to be trading it by posting things like "I'm going to short at XXX"??

If you're not trading it, you're certainly not shorting it at any price. And if you're using the cash index as your basis, you're certainly not trading it.

As far as your MSFT chart goes - before publishing that MM "nailed it", you should double check whatever function you're using to simulate the MM price levels because they're computed incorrectly - the current frame is 50-56.25, not 51.95-58.20.
 
I have always liked Electronic Arts!

I am thinking I might make enough to buy some if ERTS opens at 48.94 and trades one tick higher! Of course, as with all the other posts, these are my thoughts only, and should NEVER be used as trading advice.

Stop- 1.56 points away.
 

Attachments

Quote from ArchAngel:



OK, I was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt initially, but you've lost me.

If you don't "bother" with the S&P as you've suddenly asserted, why the heck are you pretending to be trading it by posting things like "I'm going to short at XXX"??

If you're not trading it, you're certainly not shorting it at any price. And if you're using the cash index as your basis, you're certainly not trading it.

As far as your MSFT chart goes - before publishing that MM "nailed it", you should double check whatever function you're using to simulate the MM price levels because they're computed incorrectly - the current frame is 50-56.25, not 51.95-58.20.
More...

I said in an earlier post that this was MY APPLICATION OF MM, you are quite free to use your own.

I gave my explation pal, take it or leave it.:)
 
Quote from oddiduro:

I have always liked Electronic Arts!

I am thinking I might make enough to buy some if ERTS opens at 48.94 and trades one tick higher! Of course, as with all the other posts, these are my thoughts only, and should NEVER be used as trading advice.

Stop- 1.56 points away.
More...

Are they your thoughts, or Murrey Math in practice? If the ERTS trade is Murrey Math derived, based on what you have said previously about MM being the most "efficient" and "best" method of trading that could possibly be used, why would you give us a disclaimer about taking what you say as suggested trading advice?

Are you not trading based on MM?

Why not just post what MM says to do, since it is the best way to go, right?

Are you saying that your thoughts and opinions on trades are not to be trusted or followed?

I sense a level of equivocation going on with you. So that if you are wrong, you can say, "it was my opinion, not MM..." and if right you can say "it was based on MM."

You are talking out of the many sides of a paper trader's mouth.

Why not just post the damn trades, and let the people see over time if you know what the fuck you are doing.
 
Quote from oddiduro:



I said in an earlier post that this was MY APPLICATION OF MM, you are quite free to use your own.

I gave my explation pal, take it or leave it.:)
More...


Take it or leave it? That is some big fucking chip on your shoulder.
 
Quote from OPTIONAL777:



Clearly, you are a paper trader. Everyone, everyone, everyone here who trades with real money knows that the system is only as good as the ability to execute a system.

You can give a guy a map, but unless he has some form of proper conveyance, it is meaningless, meaningless. And, even if he does have conveyance, how he reacts when going through fog, storms, tunnels, detours and the plethora of emotional and mental demons that traders face is the difference between success and failure.

Paper traders, who don't face the daily risk of loss, always think it is easy....just ask Aphie.

As long as academic types stay with paper, they don't get bloody from time to time, and they continue to spout off their 8th grade maturity level of childish nonsense about the ease of trading paper systems and their relationship to real trading involving the risk of loss and losing streaks.
More...

LOL, was that supposed to be advice????

Murrey has a perfect system, it is human error when big losses are made. I trade with real money every single week, with an academic type system.

You are funny, Optional, soon you will see the results of PRE posted trades, and you will make more excuses.

Results are what matters, pal. Watch and learn.
 
Quote from oddiduro:



LOL, was that supposed to be advice????

Murrey has a perfect system, it is human error when big losses are made. I trade with real money every single week, with an academic type system.

You are funny, Optional, soon you will see the results of PRE posted trades, and you will make more excuses.

Results are what matters, pal. Watch and learn.
More...

With each and every response from you, the chip grows larger and larger, and heavier and heavier.

Calling people pal???
....real classy.
 
Quote from oddiduro:

MM indicates that IBM might be ready to fall. Prof. Murrey is a genius!

Some folks think trading is hard, but Prof. Murrey wrote a book and a CD that show us that all we need is 8th grade math to make a profit.

I am going to short this at 86. Stop, 1.56 points away.
More...

do you mean you DID purchase the crazy wino's course? I thought you had it all for free via google?

C'mon everybody, leave OddBall alone. He's actually very entertaining.
Awright?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top