In my experience, I have found that those who can not only post, but generate in their own account consistent profits have nothing to prove.
You sure are trying hard to prove something.
MurreyMath
- Thread starter traderbambu
- Start date
In my experience, I have found that those who can not only post, but generate in their own account consistent profits have nothing to prove.
You sure are trying hard to prove something.
What can I do? I can hecklers amateurs like a professional.
Quote from oddiduro:
Well, least you are honest with yourself. Now you can take your pom-poms, and watch, while the rest of us actually TRADE for profits.
Honest with myself, yes I try to be.
Do you?
Quote from oddiduro:
Sigh
You know, they sell really nice reading glasses these days.
But I will say it yet again.
I AM WILLING TO PUT MY TRADING MONEY WHERE MY MOUTH IS, IN REAL TIME OR DAILY.
WHAT ARE YOU WILLING TO DO? Besides run your piehole?
In the past I have found your type on the yahoo boards.
Here is a sampling of statements you have made in this thread:
Ahhh, yes, the legendary marketsurfer.
I can think of no one better to make an example out of.
___________________________________________________
I await your parameters. Do not run away.
___________________________________________________
Besides, making real time market calls sharpens everyone's skills, don't you agree?
___________________________________________________
I think friendly competition is good.
___________________________________________________
Perhaps you could post a legitimate issue that you have with MM, and stop trying to persuade others to engage in your cowardice.
___________________________________________________
It is my understanding that is what this board is about, traders pushing one another.
___________________________________________________
Well, whiners, if trading is that hard of work to you, then you are doing it WRONG.
___________________________________________________
Show up on Friday, and learn something.
___________________________________________________
And quit all that cryin' will ya?? You sound jealous!! LOL
You are the one who is afraid.
___________________________________________________
I doubt seriously you are even a trader, or if you are, you are a relic from the 2000 era, sitting hunched over your pc all day.
___________________________________________________
In other words, you are still chained to a 9-5, aren't you?
A glorified wage slave.
___________________________________________________
Just because you aren't smart enough to simply your work, doesn't mean everyone else should work at your level of inefficiency.
___________________________________________________
Trading is easy, unless you are just too dumb to make it otherwise.
___________________________________________________
But I am a generous man, one less idiot in the world would benefit all mankind, so show up Monday, and get re-educated.
Me, I am more than good enough to make my own money grow.
___________________________________________________
I will try to put this delicately.
I think you are full of shit.
The only place for a real trader to focus their competitive energies concerning trading is on the markets, on the specialists, and the market makers.
Focusing your trading on proving you are a better trader than some other trader is juvenile.
When trading involves real money, real gains and losses, it is not a game. Paper trading is game playing.
Just trade, make your money, and play football, basketball, or some sports to juice up your ego.
Leave the competitive crap at the door.
If you have a system that is working, working for you, and is making money for you, why would you give a god damn about what anyone else thought of the system? It makes no sense, no sense whatsoever.
You come off like someone with a chip on their shoulder, a paper trader, a paperboy, not a seasoned trader.
When you begin to trade, really trade, you will leave you ego at the door concerning trading and other traders.
Knowing you are the last word type, go ahead and respond, you will need it to give you a sense that you have won.
Sad, really sad.
Quote from oddiduro:
A Phd in theoretical physics, huh
You didn't get that by mail order did you?
Maybe you just need to sharpen up a little, here's some help.
http://tycho.dm.unipi.it/~nobili/
http://tycho.dm.unipi.it/~nobili/murst/varenna2000/var_sec_1.pdf
http://physics.syr.edu/courses/modules/LIGHTCONE/newton-gr.html
Now you are right about one thing. Gallileo didn't know the significance of what he was doing.
So, as I said before, the theory is solid, maybe you just forgot it.
And as far as what you believe, it is not relevant to the efficacy of the system, and it is very effective.
Hey, you have a problem with my Ph.D? It can be checked... unlike the crap that you are trying to sell so badly as the next revolution in financial markets. Apparently it does not work that well if you need to add Galileo to it. But since he is dead, he won't get a heart attack...
You are just a pretentious crackpot, just like your dear MM. The same style, the same moronic, completely devoid of meaning allusion to grander things. If you want to prove that it works, keep posting the support and resistance for SP for the next two weeks and then we all can tell if it is worth anything.
One more thing... leave physics alone. I don't think anyone here will believe that you have any clue about it. The links you referred to are pretty much on a physics 201 level and are good for MM and his ilk, for me quoting the links is not physics. And no, I am not impressed. Just the opposite, as a professional in this field, I find it to be a profanation.
So, will we get the support and resistance for the next two weeks for SP or will you just keep selling this stuff abusing the names of all dead luminaries of whatever science you fancy to pretend to know?
You are right about one thing: the physics theory is solid, but even a dozen of MM followers will never make an Einstein, much less any sound theory as is obvious from your crap. Want an example? What the heck is the bar mass? You are talking about things that do not exist! So instead of abusing physics how about starting from a few basic definitions of your 'theory'. I bet, the bar mass is already too much to handle for you. For instance, how do you measure it? How do you define it?
One more quote from your 'theory': 'In still other words, bars have inertia as a function of time, and mass as a function of price.' My opinion: you even do not understand the meaning of equivalence principle that you refer to. Inertia and mass are one and the same thing, by the very virtue of equivalence principle and in fact are considered synonimous by physicists.
I don't care whether MM stuff works or not. What I care is how you present it. If you want to tell me that this has anything to do with physics, then as a physicist, I can tell you one thing: seek professional help, the sooner the better! Unjustified use of science in the name of some wacky theory is an abuse to me and I see no reason to keep quiet about it!
LOL... oddiduro... it's time to read some real science books, not some interpretation of some guru like Baumring or his related student's work.
PS. Baumring has the ideas correct except that he too like Gann left the whole shit symbolic.
Mind of oddiduro and other Gann-ese, "Gann said this, Gann said that... Guru said this, Guru said that..."
PS. Baumring has the ideas correct except that he too like Gann left the whole shit symbolic.
Mind of oddiduro and other Gann-ese, "Gann said this, Gann said that... Guru said this, Guru said that..."
Also, stop curve-fitting (not optimizing) science to fulfill your ego that you are making some sense out of MM, Gann, and science. YOu're just disgracing the whole Gann-ese by showing immature interpretations of the whole trading style.
Look, the angles work because of the nature of composite cycles. Take any form of composite cycles with common component cycles. Draw a line from a extreme top to extreme bottom. Let's say the slope is 1x1.
Now, re-adjust the component wave anyway to create another pattern of composite cycle. Take the 1x1 slope line and put it on the extreme top. You'll either see that the line will hit a bottom, 50%, or when the line passes the value of extreme bottom, you'll see a top again.
Use excel, make a composite cycle drawlines and see how it works. Make 2x1(1x2) line, make other proportionate lines to see how it goes. You'll find that the lines based on the initial line will perform just like how Gann explains Geometric Angles.
But the market is not simple as a Fourier Cycle. That's why I'm so good with Gann knowing how to relate it...
Look, the angles work because of the nature of composite cycles. Take any form of composite cycles with common component cycles. Draw a line from a extreme top to extreme bottom. Let's say the slope is 1x1.
Now, re-adjust the component wave anyway to create another pattern of composite cycle. Take the 1x1 slope line and put it on the extreme top. You'll either see that the line will hit a bottom, 50%, or when the line passes the value of extreme bottom, you'll see a top again.
Use excel, make a composite cycle drawlines and see how it works. Make 2x1(1x2) line, make other proportionate lines to see how it goes. You'll find that the lines based on the initial line will perform just like how Gann explains Geometric Angles.
But the market is not simple as a Fourier Cycle. That's why I'm so good with Gann knowing how to relate it...