Quote from slavduja:
I want to know if some intelligent folks on this forum can help me determine the best way to rank time frames.
There has been a lot of buzz nowdays about mutliple time frames trading. Normally you hear traders say I use a Entry Time frame, Intermediate and Longer time frame to gage my entries and exits etc.
Thats fine but its not clearly state why they use 3 and not 5? Why do they use 4min on entry and daily on long term??
How does one design a metric to rank the time frames ?
How do you know if you you should have time frames be in multiples of 2,3,4,5,6....n?
Do you calculate the correlation between the time series and trade ones that are least correlated??Logically the correlation would increase as the difference in time interval decreases. 1 min tim series price chart would be more correlated to 2min than 30 min.
To conclude say I wanted to use a SMA cross strategy on multiple times frames. Executing it on each time frame exclusively without referencing to others.Which would mean If i am long in on time frame X I may be short on time frame Y. How do I select the # of time frames? And why?
I want to see if others have looked into this. Prof Logic said he uses constant bars and he uses squares. Something like 7^7.. So each time frame is 7 times greater. I want to know why??How does he come to this specific calculation and on what doe she rate it on?
Thanks
Slav
I will make this really easy. Beware, the scammers and ET gurus will disagree:
All charts show the same info.
Any particular chart, such as 4 minutes, or 5 minutes, or 50 ticks, or 500 constant volume, or any unit, has no quantifiable advantage over any other chart. They all show the same info, it's just how it's divided up.
There is no magic in fib numbers. Run the fuck away from anyone who tells you you need to use a certain chart value "because it's a fibonacci number."
Same thing with perfect squares, or magic numbers, or any other of that voodoo crap.
The only time chart values matter is if you need to reference a particular timeframe, such as daily charts.
Sure, you can get the daily info from a 5 min chart, but it's much easier to use a daily chart.
Or, if you want to see like the high of the first hour or something, that's often easier if you're using hour charts, because it's right there.
Other than that, it's all a personal preference of what kind of scale you want the data to appear in.
In some cases, you might get data that appears a little more "smooth" by using a certain number of tick chart or constant volume charts, but it's still the same data that you would get from any other chart.
It's really a matter of how quickly you want the bars to print, and what you're comfortable looking at.
There is no appreciable difference between, say 500 tick charts and 501 tick charts. I encourage you to laugh heartily at anyone who suggests otherwise, because I promise you they are not a profitable trader and are just trying to swindle your money (because the only people who insist on stuff like this are people who sell trading systems).
You might not believe what I've said here, so I tell you what; bookmark this post, and if you're still trading in 5 years, come back to it, and you'll see that it's 100% true (most likely after you've lost money by buying and trading unsuccessfully a few systems that claim that magic fibonacci charts hold the answers).