Quote from AlpineTrout:
Would anyone disagree with the following, with the exception of Tums and his situation? It's from TradingComputers.com:
Dual core or Quad core?
Trading software will not use more than 2 CPU cores; so a quad core will not run your charts faster. It is better to have two fast cores rather than four slower cores in most cases. Buying an F-19 (3.41GHz) dual core saves you more than $200 over an F-11 with a quad core (3GHz) and the faster CPU speeds will do a much better job of keeping up with high volume days.
Quote from AlpineTrout:
Would anyone disagree with the following, with the exception of Tums and his situation? It's from TradingComputers.com:
Dual core or Quad core?
Trading software will not use more than 2 CPU cores; so a quad core will not run your charts faster. It is better to have two fast cores rather than four slower cores in most cases. Buying an F-19 (3.41GHz) dual core saves you more than $200 over an F-11 with a quad core (3GHz) and the faster CPU speeds will do a much better job of keeping up with high volume days.
Quote from Shaqi:
Am i right to say processing speed is only useful when downloading programs( which i can do one by one with a slower processor, im not in a rush) but once downloaded a bigger cache is better for running mutiple applications???
Duo Core 3.5Ghz Processor 4MB cache or
Quad Core 2.66GHz Processor 12MB cache
Im more interested in running 8 monitors with 16 esignal charts, 20 tradestation charts, forex broker front end, futures broker front end, email and play music at the same time which is better? Im not too concerened that about dwnloading in 2 secs but the ability to run these same time with no problems
Quote from mgookin:
No
Yes
Quad
Your download is typically limited by the slowest of the datarate at each end.
To do what you are describing a Quad core with larger L2 cache is definitely best.
You've asked about the processor. Are you going to build a complete new system, or just replace a cpu? Or are you going to buy a new system?