Mueller's Final Report on Trump Crimes expected by Sept. 1
- Thread starter exGOPer
- Start date
So where does Cohen say he colluded in the Jr. meeting?
Whether he says he knew or not, what, about this meeting constitutes collusion?
Do you know what 'collusion' means? Look up the definition, then look up how Don Jr. lied about the meetings to Congress, in his security clearance forms and how Don Sr. dictated a false statement when those lies were exposed.
And then tell me what constitutes collusion.
Oh so you are asking me for a dictionary definition to support your case?
It should be easy for you to quote the dictionary to support your case, linking the definition to what transpired in, and leading up to this meeting.
I don't think you can or will.
Haha, what a disaster....Trump's gonna get off for not being fairly represented
Avenatti keeps saying that Giuliani is Stormy Daniels second best attorney
Last edited:
I am not asking you for shit, I am telling you to look up the meaning of basic words before you try more complex cognitive tasks of understanding them as applied to the investigation being conducted by Trump's own DOJ.
I'm not asking for shit either. I'm telling you that you have lost this argument unless you can link a dictionary definition to the actual circumstances surrounding this meeting.
And when you can't do that, we will have more proof that you are misleading readers into thinking anyone in or around Trump's circle has admitted to collusion.
Time for you to admit you make shit up as you go along and present it as news.
Be specific about what argument I lost.
You opened this thread implying, more than implying, that someone in Trump's circle, who has said "no collusion" before, is now admitting to collusion, adding that collusion is not illegal.
Regardless of the legality of collusion, no one in Trump's circle has changed the tune from no collusion, to, "ok, collusion".
Unable to support your twisted view of the news you began by going outside Trump's circle to find nobody who has changed their tune either.
Finally, ending up in the Trump Jr meeting via something Cohen said, which is denied.
Even granting full knowledge of this meeting by Sr., you still can't, and so won't, tie a dictionary definition to any of its circumstances.
Having run as far as you can, and out of rope, it looks like you have hung yourself again, presenting news like CNN.
The question is not about them admitting reality since that is tantamount to admitting crimes which they will never do (I am not a crook-Nixon) - we know there was collusion because of hard evidence of emails and testimony of witnesses - the question is of them justifying that collusion is not a crime which they wouldn't have done if there was no collusion.