Mueller's Final Report on Trump Crimes expected by Sept. 1

If I was quoting Gooliani then why did I say 'they' instead of 'him' or 'he'

Learn some English instead of trolling.

'They' would be, at the very least, Trump's inner circle, which is why I said you are putting words in the mouth of Guliani, and/or Trump's inner circle. Guliani represents Trump and his legal inner circle. You were talking about Guliani in your first post. You were responding to HereAgainstTrump talking about Guliani. In context, you were talking about Guliani, making it appear as if Guliani had changed the legal argument from "NO COLLUSION" to "Okay,...collusion..." but legal.

That's not what happened.

Arguing this way, you have proved you are slimy-er than Giuliani is slick.
 
Oh. When did you stop beating your wife?

Your comments yesterday and your quips today can't get away from the fact that exGOPer tried to report that Giuliani has admitted to collusion, and lost that argument.

He is doing fine.

You are right here though, we should all try and find better ways to reach you.

Found one of your favorite types of video. 'Banned', must be good stuff.


"HOLE SHIT!"
 
If I was quoting Gooliani then why did I say 'they' instead of 'him' or 'he'

Learn some English instead of trolling.

If you weren't quoting Guliani, why did you say this a few posts later?:

We already know there was collusion, Trump's own lawyer confirmed it which is why the talking points are changing.
 
"HOLE SHIT!"

ALL CAPS DOCS FOR MORONS, remember that.
NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION NO COLLUSION

Okay, well maybe collusion, but it's not illegal.

ALL CAPS DOCS FOR MORONS, remember that.
 
He seems to have problems with language.. or is it because he is TOO smart!?

So after I asked him what lawyer he was naming, he names Cohen.

Well Cohen is not "Trump's own lawyer", and Guliani is.

So when exGOPer says Trump's lawyer has admitted to collusion, what would you expect the average CNN audience (speaking for them, not for me) to believe, given a common understanding of language?

Are both you and exGOPer hoping people can't understand language?
 

Again, he does not understand words as everyone else does. He is just stupid.

All caps docs= All capitalised documentary titles in the context.

He is mentally retarded.

Which means we should probably stop making fun of him...
 
Again, he does not understand words as everyone else does. He is just stupid.

All caps docs= All capitalised documentary titles in the context.

He is mentally retarded.

So are you saying that the title of the documentary at issue actually starts with ALL CAPS?

...as in BANNED DOCUMENTARY?
 


4.In addition, he could be charged with obstruction of justice for misdirecting investigators by dictating a misleading press release

5. Obstruction for demanding Comey drop the FBI's case against Flynn. ;) .




Bombshell new evidence offers ‘some of the strongest’ proof yet implicating Trump in obstruction: report

An explosive new report from independent journalist Murray Waas published in the New York Review of Books claims that special counsel Robert Mueller is in possession of highly incriminating evidence that implicates President Donald Trump in obstruction of justice.

Waas writes that the previously undisclosed evidence — which his sources say includes “highly confidential White House records and testimony by some of President Trump’s own top aides” — offers “some of the strongest evidence to date implicating the president of the United States in an obstruction of justice.”


In fact, sources who have reviewed the evidence now think it is “all but inevitable” that Mueller will deliver a report to the United States Department of Justice that will make a case that the president broke the law.

The central piece of evidence regards former FBI Director James Comey’s claim that Trump had asked him to drop the FBI’s case into former national security adviser Michael Flynn, whom Trump had fired in early 2017 after he lied to the FBI about his conversations with then-Russian ambassador to the United States Sergey Kislyak during the presidential transition period after the 2016 election.

Trump’s attorneys have tried to argue that Trump believed that Flynn was already in the clear when he asked Comey to drop the case — however, Waas’ sources say that “previously undisclosed evidence indicates just the opposite — that President Trump was fully informed that Flynn was the target of prosecutors.”

Specifically, Waas writes that a “a confidential White House memorandum” written shortly before Trump made his request to Comey indicates that then-chief of staff Reince Priebus and White House counsel Don McGahn both directly told the president that Flynn was under criminal investigation.

The entire report, which outlines a damning timeline of events regarding Trump’s interactions with Comey, can be read in its entirety at this link.
 
Back
Top