Mueller Investigators Say Full Report ‘More Troubling’ For Trump Than AG Barr Let On

You are such a misrepresenting low life.
I given you the links in the past... yet you still misrepresent... you know that rasmuessen called hillary plus 2 .. which is where it turned out.
Arguably only jem called it better.


Rasmuessen picked hillary as the winner giving her a plus 2.

And throught the cycle they were far more accurate than you favorite polls until your crooked polls unskewed in the last few weeks.
And I told your dumb birther ass I dont just look at thier final poll.Rasmussen polled Trump/Hillary for months as did other polls.While most polls had Hillary ahead in around 90% of thier polls Rasmussen often had Trump ahead.Rasmussen had Trump ahead more than any other poll.
 
According to a New York Times report published Wednesday evening, members of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team think that the actual Mueller report is far “more troubling” for President Donald Trump than Attorney General William Barr let on in his four-page letter.

The Times reports:

Some of Robert S. Mueller III’s investigators have told associates that Attorney General William P. Barr failed to adequately portray the findings of their inquiry and that they were more troubling for President Trump than Mr. Barr indicated, according to government officials and others familiar with their simmering frustrations.

At stake in the dispute — the first evidence of tension between Mr. Barr and the special counsel’s office — is who shapes the public’s initial understanding of one of the most consequential government investigations in American history. Some members of Mr. Mueller’s team are concerned that, because Mr. Barr created the first narrative of the special counsel’s findings, Americans’ views will have hardened before the investigation’s conclusions become public.


https://www.mediaite.com/trump/brea...more-troubling-for-trump-than-ag-barr-let-on/

There goes the coverup.

So once again the New York Times pushes a narrative based on anonymous sources. In the recent two years this has blown up in their faces regularly in their anti-Trump narrative.

Mueller's office was pretty much leak proof. I don't expect any Mueller investigators are breaking that confidence now knowing that it will probably lead to their own indictments. I expect the claims that the information came from Mueller investigation insiders is a pure fabrication. But of course this does not stop the New York Times from pushing their fictional narrative.

If the New York Times expects us to believe this narrative then they better spell out directly which Mueller investigators they got their story from. (Let me help with this the answer is most likely - no one).
 
So once again the New York Times pushes a narrative based on anonymous sources. In the recent two years this has blown up in their faces regularly in their anti-Trump narrative.

Mueller's office was pretty much leak proof. I don't expect any Mueller investigators are breaking that confidence now knowing that it will probably lead to their own indictments. I expect the claims that the information came from Mueller investigation insiders is a pure fabrication. But of course this does not stop the New York Times from pushing their fictional narrative.

If the New York Times expects us to believe this narrative then they better spell out directly which Mueller investigators they got their story from. (Let me help with this the answer is most likely - no one).

Release the Mueller report and prove it's wrong - nobody is going to believe the criminals own narrative that they got cleared.
 
Release the Mueller report and prove it's wrong - nobody is going to believe the criminals own narrative that they got cleared.

I will be happy to the see the redacted Mueller report released. It needs to be redacted to provide the committed anonymity to grand jury witnesses and to not include confidential national security information. Barr has committed to provide this in mid-April. The Democrats are currently making noise over nothing by demanding the "full Mueller report" -- these clowns are already getting the full Mueller report. Shortly the Democrats are going to look like idiots again -- and it is entirely on their heads for being complete nitwits.
 
I will be happy to the see the redacted Mueller report released. It needs to be redacted to provide the committed anonymity to grand jury witnesses and to not include confidential national security information. Barr has committed to provide this in mid-April. The Democrats are currently making noise over nothing by demanding the "full Mueller report" -- these clowns are already getting the full Mueller report. Shortly the Democrats are going to look like idiots again -- and it is entirely on their heads for being complete nitwits.

Hold on a second, the report can get clearance from the courts to be released unredacted. We should all be pushing for that.
 
Hold on a second, the report can get clearance from the courts to be released unredacted. We should all be pushing for that.

So you are pushing for a report to be released including all sorts of confidential national security information?

Many of the witnesses who testified in front of the grand jury where promised anonymity in writing. Are you going to release their names so they can promptly sue the government for millions for breaking the agreement? If the government starts revealing the names of witnesses who were promised anonymity in legal proceedings then who in their right mind would ever provide evidence for the government in the criminal matter knowing the government will simply reveal their names so they get wiped out by violent criminal defendants in mob & gang trials.

You better think this out better. Releasing an unredacted Mueller report is not the legal standard the U.S. should establish. Any judge who makes that type of decision deserves to have their legal career terminated immediately.
 
So you are pushing for a report to be released including all sorts of confidential national security information?

Many of the witnesses who testified in front of the grand jury where promised anonymity in writing. Are you going to release their names so they can promptly sue the government for millions for breaking the agreement? If the government starts revealing the names of witnesses who were promised anonymity in legal proceedings then who in their right mind would ever provide evidence for the government in the criminal matter knowing the government will simply reveal their names so they get wiped out by violent criminal defendants in mob & gang trials.

You better think this out better. Releasing an unredacted Mueller report is not the legal standard the U.S. should establish. Any judge who makes that type of decision deserves to have their legal career terminated immediately.

It doesn’t matter what they were promised, they are compelled to be truthful in a grand jury proceeding lest they perjure themselves. Their anonymity can be maintained anyway, witness 1, witness 2 etc.
 
It doesn’t matter what they were promised, they are compelled to be truthful in a grand jury proceeding lest they perjure themselves. Their anonymity can be maintained anyway, witness 1, witness 2 etc.

Well if their anonymity can be maintained via witness 1, witness 2, etc. then the Mueller report needs to be redacted to remove their actual names.

It very much matters what the grand jury witnesses were promised. According to an earlier article by the Washington Post (from memory) over 60% of federal criminal trials include witnesses who were promised anonymity. Do you think that any witness would ever step up and provide testimony for a federal case if they knew their real names would be released? They would be insane to do this knowing that criminal gangs would rub them and their families out.
 
Last edited:
you don't even know what the hell you are talking about.

one year you tell picking the winner is your key.
the next election you tell us picking the vote regardless of the magnitude of the size of the victory is the way.

you are so full of shit you make Trump and the Clintons look like honest abe.

And I told your dumb birther ass I dont just look at thier final poll.Rasmussen polled Trump/Hillary for months as did other polls.While most polls had Hillary ahead in around 90% of thier polls Rasmussen often had Trump ahead.Rasmussen had Trump ahead more than any other poll.
 
Release the Mueller report and prove it's wrong - nobody is going to believe the criminals own narrative that they got cleared.
Nope. AG Barr already released his summary. Perhaps, you can wait for the overly redacted Mueller report.

Can you tell us another story about how Don jr is fucked and Mueller will indict him?
 
Back
Top