He is? How do you know? Are you on his team? Sounds like a Wild Ass Guess to me
Mueller And His Team Are Doing A Good Job
- Thread starter UsualName
- Start date
He isn't? How do you know? Conjecture again? Sounds like it.
How do you know? What were the felonies that they were let off on? --Ah is this another guess?
At least you have put your money done on the favored said.
Actually it appears that IT is and HE is. ----Nothing yet whatsoballsout on Russian Collusion during campaign.
You mean like charging someone for activity 11 yrs ago well before Trump started running for Pres. ---yes quite a surprise---
Eh, we’re starting to get a picture of the quo in terms of collusion. To Trump, I can’t say if he will be caught up in collusion if there are any charges of collusion at all. His biggest liabilty lies around obstruction of justice.
What the Flynn Plea Means.
There’s less to the news than meets the eye.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/454269/michael-flynn-plea-no-breakthrough-russia-investigation
There’s less to the news than meets the eye.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/454269/michael-flynn-plea-no-breakthrough-russia-investigation
I think you are seriously underestimating Bannon. The establishment does not like Trump, but they fear Bannon. And they are correct in doing so, singlehandedly, he has put all of their jobs in jeopardy. Bannon forced all the liberal Republicans to work with Trump, against their will. It was a beautiful move.
Of course the question was relevant to what Starr was after, i.e., perjury, and of course Clinton's attorney objected. But the ""Jury" saw it differently. We should not forget that that "jury" was made up of adulterers and adulteresses, and plain old, everyday Americans that thought your sex life was your own business and had nothing to do with running the government. They felt Hillary's pain, so to speak..
No, when Bill Clinton committed perjury it had nothing to do with Ken Starr and it was before Ken Starr was even in the picture. Clinton committed perjury in the case brought forward by Paula Jones. Jones' lawyer wanted to establish an pattern of behavior by Clinton and he was asked about his interactions with Monica during the trial. Clinton was asked about it under oath and he lied about it, plain and simple.
Clinton knew his goose was cooked in that case and ended up settling for $850,000, a hefty sum for someone who the media claims did nothing wrong. You almost never hear about this settlement in the media, do you?