And and and ...if he were a Maasai warrior with a bone thru his nose and he used a spear instead of a pistol ...and if he was an illegal Maasai warrior who came over here with a visa that expired
then we'd have to build a wall ...somewheres.
MSNBC's outrageous dishonesty
- Thread starter bugscoe
- Start date
And and and ...if he were a Maasai warrior with a bone thru his nose and he used a spear instead of a pistol ...and if he was an illegal Maasai warrior who came over here with a visa that expired
then we'd have to build a wall ...somewheres.
Quote from insider trading:
I guess you think invading Iraq for weapons of mass destruction is honest
As hard as I know it is for you left hanging kooks to stay focused, we're not talking about Bush, Fox, Palin, Reagan, etc. It's the MSNBC video...
Now, since you've called many people racists on this forum, you seem to be an expert at picking them out. So-
In the video, they claim the AP reported about a "dozen" people there carrying guns but the focus of the video is a black man.
I figure you've got an opportunity to show us possibly 11 white guys that were there with guns- apparently MSNBC forgot to get footage of them for their race hating story and the white guy they did show appears to be an Obama supporter, judging by his t-shirt.
Come on, it can't be that hard with all the racists running around in a country with 87% of the population being non-black and in country with a black president!
Quote from omegapoint:
And and and ...if he were a Maasai warrior with a bone thru his nose and he used a spear instead of a pistol ...and if he was an illegal Maasai warrior who came over here with a visa that expired
then we'd have to build a wall ...somewheres.
In the video, they claim the AP reported about a "dozen" people there carrying guns but the focus of the video is a black man.
I figure you've got an opportunity to show us possibly 11 white guys that were there with guns- apparently MSNBC forgot to get footage of them for their race hating story and the white guy they did show appears to be an Obama supporter, judging by his t-shirt.
Come on, it can't be that hard with all the racists running around in a country with 87% of the population being non-black and in country with a black president!
Is the best you can come up with for an insult? Very pathetic buttscoe...
see that was funny and creative, that's how you do this online put down stuff buttscoe, err bugscoe.
See it's funny and calls you a butt at the same time.
When you go to work tomorrow get one of your smart coworkers to help you with a decent come back.
Live and learn buttscoe.
Now come on junior lets see what you have, you can do better than lame gay put downs can't you. Think buttscoe think.
Bad intelligence???
You've got to be kidding.
We had NO intelligence!
That is unless you place a lot of weight on the highly mistaken Condi Rice about some imported aluminum tubes that our very own Energy Dept. laughed at when she and the Bush Administration suggested that they could be used to carry uranium in an 81-mm aluminum rotor centrifuge.
Or, when Bush claimed in his 2003 State of The Union Speech that "the British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa" based on forged documents that the CIA and State Dept. could never verify.
The Washington Post reported:
"Dozens of interviews with current and former intelligence officials and policymakers in the United States, Britain, France and Italy show that the Bush administration disregarded key information available at the time showing that the Iraq-Niger claim was highly questionable."
And you claim we had BAD intelligence?
How about NO intelligence.
The face of no intelligence...
<img src=http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_1ATnOmiGPsQ/SLdwr4NZwMI/AAAAAAAAEHM/uMmRlh9Lox8/s1600/bush%2Bdrunk1.jpg>
<img src=http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_1ATnOmiGPsQ/SLdwr4NZwMI/AAAAAAAAEHM/uMmRlh9Lox8/s1600/bush%2Bdrunk1.jpg>
Here is the point of Gulf War I&II
Gulf War I traces its roots to Iran-Iraq war and the Cold War. Because Iran was behaving uncontrollably both Soviet Union and USA supported Iraq (USSR did it to a greater extent). With Soviet Union dying, USA decided Saddam Hussein was too strong in the region and decided to "clip his wings" and reassert USA dominance in the region. Furthermore, it was an opportunity for USA to entrench itself on "holy ground" (Saudi Arabia) using Iraq as a threat.
Kuwait was slant drilling into Iraq territory. USA decided to spring its trap. US ambassador to Iraq told him that "USA has no interest in your dispute with Kuwait", Iraq invaded, USA replied.
As time went on it became increasingly desirable to have Iraqi oil on the market. Because of sanctions, this was not possible. US was certainly not going to apologize to Saddam or take off sanctions so in order for Iraqi oil to be flowing freely on the world market, saddam had to be removed.
Overthrowing Saddam was one of the primary objectives of W presidency. In essence, war with Iraq was inevitable the moment Supreme Court gave him the presidency.
It was oil and not any imaginary threat from Iraq that was the reason for invasion. Control of flow of oil, not its possession.
I laugh at people who think Iraq was of any threat to USA. Iraq was not even a threat to USA in 1991, when US military was less powerful and Iraqi more powerful than their 2003 counterparts.
Gulf War I traces its roots to Iran-Iraq war and the Cold War. Because Iran was behaving uncontrollably both Soviet Union and USA supported Iraq (USSR did it to a greater extent). With Soviet Union dying, USA decided Saddam Hussein was too strong in the region and decided to "clip his wings" and reassert USA dominance in the region. Furthermore, it was an opportunity for USA to entrench itself on "holy ground" (Saudi Arabia) using Iraq as a threat.
Kuwait was slant drilling into Iraq territory. USA decided to spring its trap. US ambassador to Iraq told him that "USA has no interest in your dispute with Kuwait", Iraq invaded, USA replied.
As time went on it became increasingly desirable to have Iraqi oil on the market. Because of sanctions, this was not possible. US was certainly not going to apologize to Saddam or take off sanctions so in order for Iraqi oil to be flowing freely on the world market, saddam had to be removed.
Overthrowing Saddam was one of the primary objectives of W presidency. In essence, war with Iraq was inevitable the moment Supreme Court gave him the presidency.
It was oil and not any imaginary threat from Iraq that was the reason for invasion. Control of flow of oil, not its possession.
I laugh at people who think Iraq was of any threat to USA. Iraq was not even a threat to USA in 1991, when US military was less powerful and Iraqi more powerful than their 2003 counterparts.