Quote from Maverick74:
Well "some" would be assumed. You can use the word "some" with anything. There would be no point to doing or publishing a study where one concludes that "some" people are capable of doing this or that. I believe that would fall under stating the obvious.![]()
This sort of lends itself to what we were discussing yesterday and I'm going to have to disagree with you here. To me, one single study uncorroborated by other independent studies is meaningless. That's me. However, that has not stopped Time, MSNBC, and a host of other media organs from running with it. The average person would read that headline and draw a conclusion based on it.
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23991888-trading-is-a-game-played-by-psychopaths.do
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/09/26/traders-more-reckless-than-psychopaths-study-shows/
http://www.forbes.com/sites/chrisbarth/2011/09/26/new-study-old-news-stock-traders-are-psychopaths/
(Forbes doesn't mice words at all in their headline. They even include a pic of good ole Patrick Bateman, wielding a shiny kitchen knife, to really drive the point home)
As you may have gathered, I am distrustful of the media. When I see something perpetuated like this I have to wonder why.