MSNBC 50th anniversary of March on wash to confirm we are just as racist as back then

M

Max E.

MSNBC uses the 50th anniversary of March on washington to confirm we are just as racist as back then

It is pretty alarming that the race hustling movement has actually been able to brain wash Emmit Till's own family members into believing we are just as bad as we were the day that people tortured emmitt till, admitted to it and got off.

One of these bone heads even went so far as to say we are still confronted by the same kind of emmitt till tragedies and injustices on a daily basis, id love for them to name a single one.

What world are these people living in?

Emmett Till Family Questions Improvement in Race Relations: ‘Who are They Asking? The Bigots?’

<iframe src="http://videos.mediaite.com/embed/player/?content=B87ZJ622G6KYV4VK&content_type=content_item&layout=&playlist_cid=&widget_type_cid=svp&read_more=1" width="420" height="421" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" scrolling="no" allowtransparency="true"></iframe>

In 1955, 14-year-old Emmett Till was tortured and murdered by white Mississippi men for the imagined crime of “flirting with a white woman.” His killers were acquitted but later bragged about their involvement in that crime. Nearly 60 years later, parallels are being drawn between that crime and the killing of Trayvon Martin. Friday on MSNBC, the surviving members of Till’s family lashed out at the notion that race relations had measurably improved in the 50 years that had passed since the civil rights movement’s march on Washington, D.C.

MSNBC anchor Craig Melvin read from the results of a Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll which recently asked Americans for their thoughts on how much race relations had improved in the United States. In that poll 54 percent of adults agreed that more people in America are “judged not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.” That included 59 percent of whites and 54 percent of Hispanics. However, only 19 percent of African-Americans agreed with this statement.

Till’s cousin, Ollie Gordon, explained this by observing that African-Americans experience racism more than other groups. “You are still looked at and viewed and judged by the color of your skin in the black community,” Gordon said. “As when you go into apply for a job, when you go into stores, you’re still kind of looked at suspiciously.”

“They kind of still follow you around in the stores as to think that maybe you’re going to take something that you possibly don’t have the money to pay for it,” she continued.

“I still encountered racism even in restaurants,” Gordon continued. “You go and you may get served last or you may not get served at all. We kind of experienced that just yesterday here in Washington.”

“We’re still confronted with mass incarcerations,” Airickca Gordon-Taylor, another cousin of Till’s, agreed. “We’re still confronted with many hate crimes very similar to what Emmett Till suffered.”

She said that, while perhaps less overt, instances of racial violence and racial injustice – like the acquittal of Martin’s killer – are just as problematic were violent incidents 50 years ago.

“Across the country, when you’re still confronted with the same type of injustices and the same type of tragedies, it’s hard to say we have moved anywhere from 50 years ago,” Gordon-Taylor concluded.

Simeon Wright, another cousin of Till’s, expressed his frustration over the poll’s results, saying that they never asked him for his opinion. “Who are they asking? The bigots?” Wright said.

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/emmtt-ti...ace-relations-who-are-they-asking-the-bigots/
 
Why is it that both 59% of whites, and 54% of latinos believe people are judged by the content of their character not the color of their skin, while only 19% of blacks believe that?

Whats the difference in the black community? Could it be the race hustlers like Al Sharpton, and Jessie Jackson, Joy Ann Reaid, and this Tim Wise ass hat?

Off the Rails: MSNBC Guest Claims GOP ‘White Nationalist, Afrikaner, Boer Party’

“Do you think we’re ever going to have a real conversation about race in this country?” MSNBC guest host Joy-Ann Reid asked her guest at the conclusion of one of the most self-serving and dishonest segments on the subject of race in the United States
yet broadcast on her network.

<iframe src="http://videos.mediaite.com/embed/player/?content=NSMDTY0LFJSPHJQ8&content_type=content_item&layout=&playlist_cid=&widget_type_cid=svp&read_more=1" width="420" height="421" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" scrolling="no" allowtransparency="true"></iframe>

Reid’s cable news home has taken the occasion of the 50th Anniversary of the civil rights movement’s march on Washington D.C. and Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s iconic “I Have a Dream” speech to, ironically, set race relations back as far as they can. In the name of furthering progress by highlighting injustices – real or perceived – some of the networks’ hosts have set out on a mission to alienate as many minorities from the political system as possible by creating boogiemen and normalizing language commonly recognizable as hate speech by anyone who does not outright agree with the sentiments expressed.

Joining Joy Reid on Friday was “anti-racism activist” and author Tim Wise. In that segment, host and guest attacked some conservative media outlets for calling on civil rights leaders to address the killing of Christopher Lane, an Australian exchange student, by three teens, two black and one white. Those conservative outlets were wrong to ascribe a racial motive to what apparently is something far worse, a perfectly indiscriminate killing. However, those outlets were partially justified in that they were appealing to the dubious precedent set by the media and by a number of MSNBC hosts slash activists who perpetuated the notion – now an article of faith in spite of its lack of any empirical evidence – that the killing of Trayvon Martin by George Zimmerman was racially motivated.

The perpetually dishonest “dialogue” on race was further elevated when Wise insisted that the Republican Party as a whole is a segregationist party. Wise insisted that the GOP is “a white nationalist, Afrikaner, Boer party.”

Scared yet, African-Americans? If you’re not, they’ll try harder.

We are not talking about the inability of the American justice system to provide recompense for the family of Emmett Till who, in 1955 was tortured and murdered. No, we’re talking about the inconvenience of long voting lines, forcing voters to cast ballots within 72 hours of election day or to identify each candidate individually, or the indignity of invasive police procedures in high-crime neighborhoods of New York City. Are there racial implications to these issues? I am prepared to concede that there may be, but it is debatable. Logical people can have that debate without impugning the motives of the participants. However, are these issues even remotely comparable to the struggles faced by those who marched across the Edmund Pettus Bridge into a crushing wave of batons and tear gas? Even the suggestion that they are in the same universe is offensive.

The National Review’s Charles W. Cooke said it better than anyone today in his must-read column excoriating the media and the higher education establishment for taking seriously what proved to be yet another racist hoax at Oberlin University in Ohio. In this most recent case, an Organizing for Action volunteer (previously Organizing for America, the activist arm of President Barack Obama’s reelection campaign) manufactured evidence of racism on his campus to drive attention to the cause of rampant racial injustice.

Cooke notes that addressing perceived injustice in America is so pressing for some that incidents of injustice must be fabricated. To stable and well-adjusted individuals, this seems absurd. For others, it is a necessary push to bring about the revolution – an end for which any means are inherently virtuous.

Then there are those for whom racism is spectral, fleeting but pervasive, virtually imperceptible but for the few blessed mediums who can identify it and communicate its meaning to the masses. So-called “dog whistle” racism is an example of this phenomenon, though the “dog whistles” often miss their supposedly intended targets but are somehow clear as day for the finely-tuned racism detectors in our midst. In short, so much of what is decried as racial injustice of today’s America is inflated or invented from whole cloth.

The method by which the architects of fake hate crimes elect to raise awareness is functionally indistinguishable from that of the show trial. As dictators of all stripes justify their behavior on the grounds that the message is more important than are the facts of the case — or, for that matter, than is the sacred innocence of the falsely accused — so the perpetrators of “hate crime” hoaxes have their own elevated ideologies, into whose service real lives must be pressed. Objective truth is just a casualty of the plan — an inconvenience that must be ruthlessly subjugated to the narrative. It would presumably come as an unpleasant surprise to these miscreants that their behavior carries the very whiff of totalitarian mania that they believe themselves to be denouncing. But it does.
More...

“This phenomenon, people maintaining their views regardless of the evidence to the contrary, is inextricable from the peculiar way in which Americans who readily admit that they ‘never thought’ they’d see a black president in their lifetime refuse to alter their assessments of their country’s racial virtue now that they find themselves in a black president’s second term,” Cooke adds in a post which is required reading.

It is sad that MSNBC sees it as their mission to address racial animus by propagating it. People who make money by calling one of America’s two political parties a “white nationalist” party are not furthering race relations. Democrats regularly bristle at the offensive comparisons that some black conservatives draw between the Democratic Party and antebellum plantation owners. And yet, statements like Wise’s are greeted as insightful analysis.

On Friday, the hosts and contributors of MSNBC displayed messages as to how they were working to “Advance the Dream” that King articulated 50 years ago today. But the happy bromides they wrote down on white boards are utterly and completely undone by their actions. Segments like these do not advance the dream, they destroy it.
 
Quote from Ricter:

Agreed, they're wrong.

But you are still looking for outliers, and shrieking.
More...

Outliers would be going to twitter to look for racist comments from random individuals, these people are mainstream news anchors, their opinion goes out to millions of people, nice try.

If i was looking for random outliers i would be posting the kind of garbage that gets put up by random individuals on twitter, or in the comment section of an article, this is a tactic that MSNBC regularly engages in, finding tweets from racists, and using them to show how racist everyone is.
 
Quote from Ricter:

I'm surprised you don't.
More...

No i dont use the lefts tactics of finding one sign in a crowd of tens of thousands in order to malign the entire tea party as racist.
 
Quote from Max E. Pad:

No i dont use the lefts tactics of finding one sign in a crowd of tens of thousands in order to malign the entire tea party as racist.
More...
I don't believe you are the only shrieker.
 
People used to lynch blacks back then, torture them, etc., Today, blacks get to sit in restaurants and "mean mug" a white person across from them as they hate whitey, and want to kill him. Meanwhile, "whitey" who's legally armed leaves the restaurant early to avoid a confrontation. Yeah, their march means just "so" much to me. Lol! And btw, who are the real racists today? Hmmmm...:confused:
 
Much of this racism is projected this way.
Blacks claim racialism exist because of the way they assume white people are thinking about them.

They cite very few current examples. Most examples used to support their assumptions are ugly events that happened over 50 years ago in the Democratic deep South.

I object to these commentators for assuming the thoughts in my mind are racist when I see a person of color.

They Black leaders also are doing a good job educating every new generation what the old Black stereotypes were.
Most of the stereotypes don't even has a basis in reality in this age.

Just like old Polish, Italian, and even many Mexican stereotypes, just let them fade away.
 
I'm as racist as I was in the '50's. It wasn't much of anything I gave a rats' ass about then and it still isn't as long as I'm far away from a ghetto.

Think how close many elections are. If Democrats didn't have that Black vote sewed up at the 95% level like they do they wouldn't be in any offices, nearly anywhere. They have to keep those Black voters voting for them. That means we have to have the racism message shoved down our throats for the rest of our existences. That also means that Democrats can't ever let Blacks out of the inner city reservations they have created. If Blacks got good jobs they would become Republicans. The Democrats have to continue this continual psyop to keep Blacks following marxist leaders like Jessie Jackemup and voting against Whitey.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top