Mr. Williams responds

marketsurfer · Mar 13, 2006

Quote from Thunderdog:

And as I noted, I am getting the 6-page document, which includes 1 page covering the appeal, in the mail. If I post it when I receive it, you would not believe it to be authentic, anyway. Therefore, I told you where you can get it at the source. It seems that your "extensive research" may not have been that extensive after all. Please don't expect me to spoon feed you.

you are assuming i have not read the documentation, dog. come on, you can do better than this.

best,

surfer

Thunderdog · Mar 13, 2006

Quote from marketsurfer:

you are assuming i have not read the documentation, dog. come on, you can do better than this.

best,

surfer

Whoa. First you questioned its existence:

Quote from marketsurfer:

no, dog. i just will not respond to a partial statement taken from a dubious source. the NFA situation should be easy to locate--- having some issues finding anything?? LOL!

surfer

And now you are saying that you have read it?

Surfer, you are talking from both sides of your mouth now. It really is not very becoming.

Pekelo · Mar 13, 2006

Quote from Thunderdog:

I actually have you off of ignore this week.

Yippie!!

So can we get back to my original questions:

1. What was Larry trading in his fund?
2. What was the loss in % of the whole fund, instead of absolute numbers?
3. Was he solely responsible for the losses?
4. Were the losses from a few large trades, or consistently losing money with small trades?

And most importantly:

5. What is the evidence that the accounts were mixed??

Pekelo · Mar 13, 2006

Quote from Thunderdog:

Pekelo, you don't even know what you don't know.

Well, one more non-answer like this, and I AM going to put you on Ignore. I already toyed with the idea, but I am still curious what you can come up with...

Oh yeah, I actually know it. Nothing....

Pekelo · Mar 13, 2006

Quote from Thunderdog:

PART 1

one wonders why Larry has not entered the contest again. After all, the contest his marketing material keeps harping on took place almost 20 years ago. Wouldnât it be nice if he entered it again just to reassure us that he has still âgot it?â
END OF PART 1

Of course I already addressed this above. He entered via his daughter. She made 1000% using Larry's strategy. Are you suggesting that she cheated as well?

But here is a logic question for you. If Larry cheated in the championship, why did he make such an outstanding return when he must have known, that a 10000+% profit will bring extra scrutiny? He could have just been happy with a let's say 500% return, still outrageous, but maybe less obvious.... You know that's how real crooks think....

Thunderdog · Mar 13, 2006

Pekelo,

After further consideration, I think you belong on ignore after all. The benefit of the doubt I have been painfully trying to give you is now revoked. It is plain to me that you are still in high school and that you are finding it rather...challenging. On the plus side, you have marketsurfer on your side. That says a lot about both of you.

I sincerely hope that you save up enough money to one day attend Larry's seminars. Please trust me when I tell you that you truly do deserve it. In the meantime, be sure to buy his books and subscribe to whatever else he may be selling at the moment. Your future is waiting for you.

Choad · Mar 13, 2006

Quote from Thunderdog:

...Because I do not have a fax machine, the full text of the case is being sent to me by mail,

Just as a FWIW, if you have a computer and phone line, you have a fax machine.

Of course you need a dialup modem, but most computers still come with them AFAIK, or you can get them for $10, or free with rebate during a Staples sale.

XP Example

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/setup/learnmore/crawford_02october21.mspx

Thunderdog · Mar 13, 2006

Quote from Choad:

Just as a FWIW, if you have a computer and phone line, you have a fax machine.

Of course you need a dialup modem, but most computers still come with them AFAIK, or you can get them for $10, or free with rebate during a Staples sale.

XP Example

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/setup/learnmore/crawford_02october21.mspx

Thanks for the info, Choad. In any event, I was verbally advised of what I needed to know. The mailing that will follow will just be something I will have in hard copy as a matter of record. The dialup modem and the fax software would be of no use to me as it relates to this thread since marketsurfer would immediately contest the validity of anything I would post. That is his modus operandi. It is for this reason that I noted the reference material where this information could be obtained in full by anyone interested enough to find out. However, I appreciate the heads up on the fax software. It will probably be useful in other instances.

volente_00 · Mar 13, 2006

Quote from Pekelo:

Yippie!!

So can we get back to my original questions:

1. What was Larry trading in his fund?
2. What was the loss in % of the whole fund, instead of absolute numbers?
3. Was he solely responsible for the losses?
4. Were the losses from a few large trades, or consistently losing money with small trades?

And most importantly:

5. What is the evidence that the accounts were mixed??

Pekelo, I suspect the only reply you will recieve is the typical ad hominem.

Pekelo · Mar 13, 2006

I don't know if it is getting sad or funny. Probably both. Here we have Thunderdog (aka detective Columbo), who can not think straight, can not answer any questions and can not provide any evidence. Whenever he is cornered, he runs away with Ignore threats or personal attacks. How well, after all this is the internet, what do I expect???

But since he seems to like libraries, why don't I give him another homework? After all, he didn't finish the previous one.

So Thunderdog, go and look up in your lawlibrary Susan B. Kringle vs. Larry Williams. Report back what you find....

P.S.: You didn't dare to spell it out, but you insinuated that Michelle Williams also cheated in the championship. Any evidence for it??? Silly, me, I am asking questions again....