Yes, the ice melt predictions were wrong.
Glad you admitted it. Last time you lied and claimed that there was no prediction that the arctic would be ice free by 2013.
Yes, the ice melt predictions were wrong.
Glad you admitted it. Last time you lied and claimed that there was no prediction that the arctic would be ice free by 2013.
Is that like a bunch of people claiming that an area will be ice free by a certain date, and when that area is nowhere near being ice free they claim they never made such a prediction?
That is correct. There was no prediction the Arctic would be ice free by 2013. Certainly not by the consensus opinion of IPCC as I show in the chart above.
That is correct. There was no prediction the Arctic would be ice free by 2013. Certainly not by the consensus opinion of IPCC as I show in the chart above.
Yet these are the same Alarmists regularly screaming all the time that barely 50% of Americans support climate change because the majority of the mainstream population has not been enlightened like "97%" of the brilliant scientists.
Which is it?
Scientists in the US have presented one of the most dramatic forecasts yet for the disappearance of Arctic sea ice.
Their latest modelling studies indicate northern polar waters could be ice-free in summers within just 5-6 years.
Professor Wieslaw Maslowski told an American Geophysical Union meeting that previous projections had underestimated the processes now driving ice loss.
Summer melting this year reduced the ice cover to 4.13 million sq km, the smallest ever extent in modern times.
Remarkably, this stunning low point was not even incorporated into the model runs of Professor Maslowski and his team, which used data sets from 1979 to 2004 to constrain their future projections.
"Our projection of 2013 for the removal of ice in summer is not accounting for the last two minima, in 2005 and 2007," the researcher from the Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, explained to the BBC.
"So given that fact, you can argue that may be our projection of 2013 is already too conservative."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7139797.stm
I asked my mid-20s degreed daughter whether her friends believe in AGW (global warming/cooling is a separate issue that 100% of them agree with). She told me about half of them believe in AGW. None of them do anything to reduce their carbon footprint, but I was glad to hear only half of her friends are gullible enough to believe in AGW.
I'd like to see the exact question and poll that arrives at 97% of scientists believing in global warming. I suspect the question was worded so that it would include natural warming of the earth, not specifically addressing anthropogenic global warming.
Of course, with the deniers, this will go in one ear and straight out of the other, unimpeded by any gray matter.