We are taught by our school system and by media not to be racist against blacks but everywhere you look in the world they commit violent acts. Should they be able to play the race card to get of the hook time and time again? Many blacks end up in prison and they claim it's because of racism but even with the racial excuse they still end up there.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Most Dangerous? American Black's or Iraqis
- Thread starter Pa(b)st Prime
- Start date
We are taught by our school system and by media not to be racist against blacks but everywhere you look in the world they commit violent acts. Should they be able to play the race card to get of the hook time and time again? Many blacks end up in prison and they claim it's because of racism but even with the racial excuse they still end up there.
Quote from steve46:
Just because humans share a genetic basis doesn't negate their cultural conditioning.
Mexicans and blacks from specific neighborhoods are culturally "trained" by the time they are 10 or 11 years old to get into gangs, beat each other up, rob liquor stores and do drive by shootings. They also like tacos, tatoos, and women with big booties who wear lots of lipstick....Just a cultural fact of life. Oh and I forgot about low riders........
So actually you seem to be out of touch with reality....Perhaps you should take a field trip to southeast los angeles and update your data?
I agree by the way, on your decision to cut back on posting. If your world view is so constrained that you cannot carry on an intelligent conversation, then all you will be doing here is getting frustrated.......good luck..
Thanks
They are very violent people and make places less desirable. Normal people don't want to have kids in crack neighborhoods. Drugs make people very liberal about sex. Blacks are very agressive about sex at a very young age which is not normal for a human.
I'm not going out of my way to put them down these are just facts. They try to ban racial statistics so they can hide the facts. Personally I like to know what kind of neighborhood I'm in.
If there's black, hispanic, or red neck crime zones. We all know the blacks and hispanics run around in gangs and target whites. When I was young I got bounced around in schools because I came from a broken family. The blacks and hispanics were very verbally abusive and always wanted to fight. I never seen anywhere in the United States where blacks or hispanics have had to put up with this kind of abuse in modern times but they do it on a daily basis to whites and I'm sure other cultures. Everyday I would go to school and I would hear endless put downs. White boy this white boy that. They would spit on me and try to jump me when walking home. I got gang beat one time by these mexicans gang members and this black gang just laughed while I nearly was killed. Don't get me wrong I'm a big guy so I did bash some heads on 1on1's even 1on2's but still that's not the point of school. I was never looking for fights but I got jumped anyway. I ended up dropping out of high school twice although I wanted to finish. I had to get a GED because of the neighborhood I lived in San Jose California. They want a violent atmosphere that is their way. There were some nicer Mexican but they were on the white side. Still the majority are low life trash. I had 2 White Mexican friends growing up but they were very respectable and didn't run around in gangs.
Okay...Quote from nealvan:
They are very violent people ...Drugs make people very liberal about sex. Blacks are not normal for a human.
Ah...Quote from nealvan:
When I was young I got bounced around in schools because I came from a broken family.
Not a huge surprise given the content of this post.Quote from nealvan:
Everyday I would go to school and I would hear endless put downs.
This whole sequence is very sad. Just goes to show what can happen when a kid doesn't have good role models.
Quote from steve46:
I think Pabt's logic is sound
I disagree on the details however. Personally I feel that the Mexicans of Southeast Los Angeles are much more dangerous than the blacks...
Those Chulos often carry semi automatic weapons and although they can't shoot very accurately they tend to make up for it by spraying the community with ammunition. Quite often they kill innocent pedestrians in addition to their intended targets.
Of course my comments relate to southeast los angeles only. In northern california we have a different situation in Oakland and Richmond. In both of those towns, both blacks and mexicans carry weapons and are actively looking for opportunities to use them...I don't know why, but those mexicans seems to shoot much more accurately than the blacks. Perhaps they do more target shooting and have a better training program in place for their young gang bangers. Anyway that is my take on the subject.
Those who are eager to link race to crime should remeber that correlation does not mean causation.
No one disputes that African-Americans are charged with and are imprisoned for committing violent crimes at a rate higher than average. But those racists--yes, an appropriate label for those who judge others by the color of their skin--who think it is a matter of skin color should consider other factors that are demonstrably more closely linked with violent crime: education, culture, family background.
If skin color CAUSED one to commit violent crime, then one would expect that other darker skinned individuals--natives of India, for instance--would also commit violent crime in great numbers.
But I have never seen evidence that they do.
For that matter, light skinned peoples--Scandinavian peoples, for instance--have not been historically the most non-violent. Today Sweden may be a peaceful country, thanks to culture, education, and such, but when you had warriors nicknamed "Skullsplitter" sailing across the Atlantic to rape, pillage, and shed blood, times were different.
Enough sloppy thinking on this thread already, please.
My point is that blacks and hispanics quickly turn where they live into ghettos. This is a fact. I have a natural tendency to make my surroundings nice. We are not all born the same. I have my own personality and most whites and asians are more peaceful than blacks and browns. If you look in literature we have classical arts their cultures do not. They are inherently more violent. I've seen blacks and hispanics get angry and they act more like animals than people. White and Asian peoples do not naturally act this way. Don't even tell me that a pit bull is natually as nice as an irish setter. They are a violent race and that's why most end up in prison and turn their surroundings ghettos. Last comment! I'm out of here losers!!!!
Quote from smilingsynic:
Those who are eager to link race to crime should remeber that correlation does not mean causation.
No one disputes that African-Americans are charged with and are imprisoned for committing violent crimes at a rate higher than average. But those racists--yes, an appropriate label for those who judge others by the color of their skin--who think it is a matter of skin color should consider other factors that are demonstrably more closely linked with violent crime: education, culture, family background.
If skin color CAUSED one to commit violent crime, then one would expect that other darker skinned individuals--natives of India, for instance--would also commit violent crime in great numbers.
But I have never seen evidence that they do.
For that matter, light skinned peoples--Scandinavian peoples, for instance--have not been historically the most non-violent. Today Sweden may be a peaceful country, thanks to culture, education, and such, but when you had warriors nicknamed "Skullsplitter" sailing across the Atlantic to rape, pillage, and shed blood, times were different.
Enough sloppy thinking on this thread already, please.
Sloppy thinking or no thinking are often the signature of the site.
As mentioned in my post. Our genetic heritage is often negated by our cultural and environmental imperatives.
And again as mentioned previously, by the time a young person is 10 or 11, they have been indoctrinated to the extent that they "like" and "dislike" specific things....In addition, these young people are not "shocked" by the kind of violence that would appall those of us brought up in more genteel circumstances.
My thought (if we are to be serious for a nanosecond) is that it will take the effort of older folks and perhaps an imperative sponsored by some governmental agency (police for instance) to make a dent in the cultural imperatives that rule in places like southeast los angeles. If I am wrong and no one "stands up" and does the right thing, it may be that positive change will never occur or it might be that the only way to make positive cultural changes is to deport a significant portion of some of the population in order to reduce the ongoing violence we see in some of our communities.