Quote from Rearden Metal:
You attempted to portray non-whites as people who are relatively violent & barbaric, and I provided you with a little reality check. How is that <i>not</i> relevant?
Your "reality check" was entirely beside the point.
The only relevant reality check would a side-by-side comparison of groups living in the same territory, subject to the same laws at the same point in time. And the only possible "reality check", used in the sense you intend, would be a refutation of the assertion that non-whites are more violent than whites. To that end, I'll provide you with it: Eastern, especially northeastern Asians, are less violent than whites.
Your broader point that whites have been conquerors, imperialists and enslavers is understood but it covers very well worn ground and ignores the fact that every group has also been, thus I find your point redundant.
I freely admit that Aryans have a higher mean IQ score than most other peoples... which makes it even <b>more</b> shameful when they perpetrate more murders and thefts than anyone else over the long term!
That seems an empty assertion. I should like to see you back this up, providing full context.
You already know that I strongly support Ron Paul, and oppose wide-open U.S. borders, as well as gov't programs that incentivize stupid people to breed (irregardless of their ethnicity).
To your credit, you do. But you also know that most Jews do not. And you also know that if most Jews did, Paul would have a far easier time of getting his message across. As it stands, he is ignored and marginalized.
--->The problem is, you & I both know what usually comes right <i>after</i> chants of "White Pride!".
It's the same exact thing that tends to follow exclamations of "Allah-hu Akbar!"... and it means you'd better duck, fast!
Ah, the crux of the matter.
Yes, you're quite right to include me alongside yourself.
Let me ask you, Rearden: do you seriously not feel more comfortable around whites than you do around, say, Indians, or Samoans, or Africans, or Chinese or any variety of Muslim? I am betting that you do. Even fearing that at any moment silent white rage may awaken and do you in, I am betting you feel that way. (So do I.) And I bet that if you could draw a circle just wide enough around a majoritarian "we" that includes you in it you'd be quite willing to dispense with all that dreck about diversity being any sort of strength; you'd be manning the border right next to Jim Gilchrist; you'd stand right alongside David Duke demanding segregation; you'd be calling for the repatriation of every Mexican and Muslim in the country.
But there's always that risk that the white man doesn't want you, won't accept you, might run you out of his country. And therefore he must be destroyed. Not directly, of course. But his daughters must be married off to negroes; his lands given over to hispanics, asians and whoever else can sneak into his country; his religion, his traditions, his history, his art mocked, mocked mercilessly, until he himself shuns them; and he must always, always be reminded of his unique evil, to the point where if he dare raise but a finger in protest over his dispossession, we should unleash all our fury on him.
Perhaps this is what Ben Wattenberg (a jew, needless to say) had in mind when he wrote, "If you believe, as the author does, that the American drama is being played out toward a purpose, then the non-Europeanization of America is heartening news of an almost transcendental quality."
A
transcendental quality. My, my. I wonder what he'd think of the non-Judaization of Israel by tens upon tens of thousands of the poorest, dumbest and essentially useless Africans, Arabs and, say, Pakis (which isn't to say all such people are dumb and worthless, only that those who are the ones who typically traipse across borders in search of betterment)? I know that for me the non-Europeanization of Australia (essentially, the Asianization of) or the non-Serbianization of Serbia or the non-Macedonization of Macedonia would not be quite so "transcendental" as it would be, say, "profane."
Where do you stand, Rearden? Are you a budding transcendentalist? Do you look forward to cities and towns all across America one day resembling Lagos or New Delhi? If not, don't you think that maybe, just maybe, and at oh so great risk to ourselves -- to our own temporary and ultimately meaningless existence (according to you) -- we should maybe alert whites to the fate that awaits them? Alert them to the fact that they deserve a continued existence here on this earth just as all groups do? And alert them that securing such an existence is both moral and necessary? To be sure, they may well wonder why, if we knew what has taking place, we didn't speak up sooner. And they may well wonder at our role has been in what
has taken place. I'm afraid I don't have ready answers to those questions. Yet I would rather attempt to answer them than to be a party to the destruction I witness.
