Mosques (most) are part of Jihadi network - per FBI expert

Trump is a smart guy. He says mosques or religious centers that serve as recruitment and organizational bases for terrorists aren't covered by first amendment protections.

Think about it. If neo nazis used churches as an organizational base to plan attacks against blacks, that church isn't covered by 1st amendment protections because it's not engaged in the peaceful expression of religion or free speech.

It's doable. I'm not crazy about it but he has a point. Build a wall. Deport the fuckers. Curb Islamic migration. Put the suspected Islamic radicals inside the country on watch lists. Clean this shit up. That's all trump plans to do. Do people want a solution. Or do they want to complain all day and commit national suicide. Because I honestly think some people would rather complain about the problem then solve it. Trump is not hitler. We're not talking about gas chambers and death camps. Were talking about legal deportation, focused enforcement and selective immigration.

That is the best possible solution but some people don't have the balls for it. They would rather fail
 
People are so far left they equate selective immigration, and legal deportation with hitler. That's how fucking demented the left wing has become.
 
achilles28 said:
Trump is a smart guy. He says mosques or religious centers that serve as recruitment and organizational bases for terrorists aren't covered by first amendment protections.

Think about it. If neo nazis used churches as an organizational base to plan attacks against blacks, that church isn't covered by 1st amendment protections because it's not engaged in the peaceful expression of religion or free speech.

It's doable. I'm not crazy about it but he has a point. Build a wall. Deport the fuckers. Curb Islamic migration. Put the suspected Islamic radicals inside the country on watch lists. Clean this shit up. That's all trump plans to do. Do people want a solution. Or do they want to complain all day and commit national suicide. Because I honestly think some people would rather complain about the problem then solve it. Trump is not hitler. We're not talking about gas chambers and death camps. Were talking about legal deportation, focused enforcement and selective immigration.

That is the best possible solution but some people don't have the balls for it. They would rather fail
More...
don't equate the media fury around Trump with what he usually just says. It is really quite comical. One of his famous quotes is, "We want people to be able to immigrate to the United States, but they must come here legally." Now think about it. That is his media controversial statement!

and the other one that cracks me up, "If they are here illegally they must go." Is the new definition of a right wing fanatic? A man who believes we should at least enforce the laws of the United States of America?

If you listen closely, Trump has never said anything that is really controversial. It is all pretty much shallow stuff. But compared to the leftwing truth contortion artists, common sense starts sounding radical.

Is there anybody on this site that actually disagrees with Trump when he says, "We want immigrants, but they must come here legally."?
 
Last edited:
I can think of a few guys living in Canada and fraudcurrents and covertibility.

They will ape Obama's stance on any issue regardless of thought.
Ricter will try to find a cute way to defend it and the other 2 will douche it up or lie and call names.

In order to support Obama, Convertibility will will say there is no illegal immigration. When we challenge him he will call us names and pull out a chart showing illegal immigration vs change in gdp and tell us we don't understand normalization.

In fact as I think about it... very few lefties here care about the rule of law. If obama wants to break the law .. then they are all for illegal immigration.



ETcallhome said:
don't equate the media fury around Trump with what he usually just says. It is really quite comical. One of his famous quotes is, "We want people to be able to immigrate to the United States, but they must come here legally." Now think about it. That is his media controversial statement!

and the other one that cracks me up, "If they are here illegally they must go." Is the new definition of a right wing fanatic a man who believes we should at least enforce the laws of the United States of America?

If you listen closely, Trump has never said anything that is really controversial. It is all pretty much shallow stuff. But compared to the leftwing truth contortion artists, common sense starts sounding radical.

Is there anybody on this site that actually disagrees with Trump when he says, "We want immigrants, but they must come here legally."?
More...
 
Last edited:
ETcallhome said:
don't equate the media fury around Trump with what he usually just says. It is really quite comical. One of his famous quotes is, "We want people to be able to immigrate to the United States, but they must come here legally." Now think about it. That is his media controversial statement!

and the other one that cracks me up, "If they are here illegally they must go." Is the new definition of a right wing fanatic a man who believes we should at least enforce the laws of the United States of America?

If you listen closely, Trump has never said anything that is really controversial. It is all pretty much shallow stuff. But compared to the leftwing truth contortion artists, common sense starts sounding radical.

Is there anybody on this site that actually disagrees with Trump when he says, "We want immigrants, but they must come here legally."?
More...
Thank you for being rational about this !!
 
jem said:
I can think of a few guys living in Canada and fraudcurrents and covertibility.

They will ape Obama's stance on any issue regardless of thought.
Ricter will try to find a cute way to defend it and the other 2 will douche it up or lie and call names.

In order to support Obama, Convertibility will will say there is no illegal immigration. When we challenge him he will call us names and pull out a chart showing illegal immigration vs change in gdp and tell us we don't understand normalization.

In fact as I think about it... very few lefties here care about the rule of law. If obama wants to break the law .. then they are all for illegal immigration.
More...
ok, but don't confuse the free flow of labor with illegal immigration
 
What does it say about you when your girlfriend chooses to cheat on you with a muslim ?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


George Zimmerman, the man who shot and killed unarmed black teenager Trayvon Martin in 2012, has been suspended from Twitter.

Twitter took down Zimmerman’s account, @TherealGeorgeZ, on Thursday after multiple sources report he posted topless photos of a woman he said was his ex-girlfriend, and shared what he claimed were her email address and phone number.

“She cheated on me with a dirty Muslim,” Zimmerman wrote in one tweet. “She’ll sleep with anyone.”
 
achilles28 said:
Can't have open borders in a welfare state? Or during war time ?
More...
how many times do I have to answer this? Defend your closed borders or eliminate your welfare state. The choice is entirely yours.

hint: Two wrongs don't make a right

anyone with half a brain knows a closed border is a stupid idea. That's the kind of thing Kruschev and the old Soviet union came up with. Good for the barbed wire industry, but not so good for human beings.

and anyone with the other half of their brain still intact knows a welfare state is unsustainable. (I think it was the Soviet Union who also came up with that equally bad idea.)

so whoopey dooo!!! let's just have a closed border and welfare state and hope two wrongs will cancel each other out.
 
Last edited:
ETcallhome said:
how many times do I have to answer this? Defend your closed borders or eliminate your welfare state. The choice is entirely yours.

hint: Two wrongs don't make a right

anyone with half a brain knows a closed border is a stupid idea. That's the kind of thing Kruschev and the old Soviet union came up with. Good for the barbed wire industry, but not so good for human beings.

and anyone with the other half of their brain still intact knows a welfare state is unsustainable. (I think it was the Soviet Union who also came up with that equally bad idea.)

so whoopey dooo!!! let's just have a closed border and welfare state and hope two wrongs will cancel each other out.
More...
Except we're at a state of war with an opponent who specializes in asymmetric warfare? ]

So even if we got rid of the welfare state and had open borders, it would still be a bad idea because ISIS wants to sneak in and blow shit up. Am I right or am i right
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top