Quote from Duref Mudgins:
Fearless, thank you for posting that chart. No danger of anyone stealing your method. Who could understand it? Kudo's for calculating MA slope. Could one possibly grovel for a brief explanation of why you like what I believe are called "equivolume" charts? It would bug me not knowing what time it is. Things move on the half-hour, doncha know?
Delighted to help DM.
Vol charts are smoother IMHO and better represent my system.
Bear in mind that no matter how clever and how big some of the players are, they always show up at the T&S gate and essentially that is what I am watching.
The DOM is a tricky bugger to follow as orders are pulled as fast as they are added. This is not necessarily the "clever ones" trying to dick you around, but it can be Traders who preloaded their stops in anticipation of a signal which did not eventuate and so they pull their order.
And so, I do not follow the DOM anymore.
T&S ladder is a different kettle of fish as it reveals all positions and so I have chosen to follow the bid/ask strikes and their impact on price.
Basically, in my world, time is irrelevant as the T&S reveals all.
If traders wish to act on a 10 o'clock announcement, their actions are revealed. If it is lunchtime, the volume drops and if the volume drops, it's effect on price is quite different than when it is high.
It has taken me years to figure all this out, just as it took me years to cotton onto preloading limit stops.
In a nutshell.
If the price is rising and the ask strikes are accumulating then the correct side is long and so my long targets are bigger than my short targets.
If the price is rising and the ask strikes are waning then both targets are equal.
And so I find it easier to follow volume charts rather than time charts, even though my trading style works on either.
Not sure whether I have explained this or confused you.