I posted these last few videos because they more or less support my decision regarding workout frequency and volume.
Heart felt that, at his level of intensity, he could not do justice to a full body workout of about 8-10 sets. While I may not reach his level of intensity, I do go to full static failure and then finish with an exaggerated negative. (I might occasionally do a forced rep if I feel I didn't do enough reps compared to my previous workout, just to make sure I baked the muscle. But I don't do this as a matter of course.)
Similarly, I found that, over time, taking each set to such failure made it difficult for me to do about 10 sets full body twice a week, which is why I reduced the frequency at around the beginning of the year from twice a week to 3 times every 2 weeks, as I reported after the fact on page 2 of this thread, on March 16. However, I found that even this combo of volume/frequency was getting to be a bit much by mid-March, so I thought I'd do just once such workout weekly. But before this regimen got underway, I decided that I would halve the resistance portion of my workout to only 5 compound sets, but keep the 3x/2wk frequency, per my post day dated March 22 on page 3. And here we are.
It seems that I've come to a point that coincides with Heart's view of volume and frequency when taken to true failure, especially given my age and the number of years I have been working out. Further, deciding to reduce the resistance while still going to failure, which I did a while back, looks to have been a good choice as well. (Nothing like a little confirmation bias, eh?)
Heart felt that, at his level of intensity, he could not do justice to a full body workout of about 8-10 sets. While I may not reach his level of intensity, I do go to full static failure and then finish with an exaggerated negative. (I might occasionally do a forced rep if I feel I didn't do enough reps compared to my previous workout, just to make sure I baked the muscle. But I don't do this as a matter of course.)
Similarly, I found that, over time, taking each set to such failure made it difficult for me to do about 10 sets full body twice a week, which is why I reduced the frequency at around the beginning of the year from twice a week to 3 times every 2 weeks, as I reported after the fact on page 2 of this thread, on March 16. However, I found that even this combo of volume/frequency was getting to be a bit much by mid-March, so I thought I'd do just once such workout weekly. But before this regimen got underway, I decided that I would halve the resistance portion of my workout to only 5 compound sets, but keep the 3x/2wk frequency, per my post day dated March 22 on page 3. And here we are.
It seems that I've come to a point that coincides with Heart's view of volume and frequency when taken to true failure, especially given my age and the number of years I have been working out. Further, deciding to reduce the resistance while still going to failure, which I did a while back, looks to have been a good choice as well. (Nothing like a little confirmation bias, eh?)
Last edited:

50% reduction.