Quote from trendlover:
Quote from IShopAtPublix:
Do you honestly believe a football player over 6ft tall was going to run away from George Zimmerman? I am sure Trayvon thought he could kick his ass, he just did not take into account 9mm's.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You can watch the video and see Trayvon 3 times go away from George.
But George have his gun. I am sure George feel more power.
Don't get emotionally invested into this case. The media very shamelessly pulled on people's heart strings. They showed Treyvon when he was 8 years old giving the impression that the big bad zimmerman chased down and murdered an innocent child.
Instead the actual picture of trayvon is a menacing figure in a hoodie at over 6 feet tall. He got suspended from his high school for several days (and trust me you don't get suspended for several days for nothing). The kid was not on his way to Harvard Law Review, he was on his way to be a thug. I think they found "burglary instruments" but they could not prove were his.
Ben Crum a dbag of highest degree accused Zimmerman of having superficial wounds. Initially the media played the tape of Zimmerman saying something and claiming he said "coons". CNN was shameless about it but it turned out he said fucking punks not coons. The media marveled at a low resolution recording of Zimmerman being taken into custody that did not show much. A much higher resolution then showed significant injury. The media purposely sat on evidence. If every single picture and recording were released immediately the narrative would be completely different. Most recently there was an enhanced picture of Zimmerman with a clearly broken nose.
So what are the facts:
Zimmerman with grass stains on his back, broken nose, gashes behind his head, major bleeding.
Trayvon Martin with bruised knuckles and 1 close range gun shot to the chest.
If you believe Zimmerman chased down Trayvon and Trayvon was merely defending himself you would be hard pressed to explain how Trayvon kept hitting Zimmerman when he was on his back. It is not self defense when you are trying to finish someone off, which is what Trayvon was doing. You say Zimmerman is lying. By law if there are two equally plausible explanations given the evidence and one points to guilt and the other to acquittal the jury MUST take the acquittal route. If you don't like the zimmerman story, you don't have an alternative. Not a single witness stepped up and said they saw how the fight started.
Zimmerman does not strike me as a cold blooded killer. For a picture of cold blooded killer look at the scum that set the building on fire and killed firefighters. Zimmerman is simply a wannabe cop who almost got himself killed by playing one. He saw someone he never saw in his neighborhood before and decided to confront him. Given the history of burglaries in the area, he was well within his rights.
Quote from IShopAtPublix:
Don't get emotionally invested into this case. The media very shamelessly pulled on people's heart strings. They showed Treyvon when he was 8 years old giving the impression that the big bad zimmerman chased down and murdered an innocent child.
Instead the actual picture of trayvon is a menacing figure in a hoodie at over 6 feet tall. He got suspended from his high school for several days (and trust me you don't get suspended for several days for nothing). The kid was not on his way to Harvard Law Review, he was on his way to be a thug. I think they found "burglary instruments" but they could not prove were his.
Ben Crum a dbag of highest degree accused Zimmerman of having superficial wounds. Initially the media played the tape of Zimmerman saying something and claiming he said "coons". CNN was shameless about it but it turned out he said fucking punks not coons. The media marveled at a low resolution recording of Zimmerman being taken into custody that did not show much. A much higher resolution then showed significant injury. The media purposely sat on evidence. If every single picture and recording were released immediately the narrative would be completely different. Most recently there was an enhanced picture of Zimmerman with a clearly broken nose.
So what are the facts:
Zimmerman with grass stains on his back, broken nose, gashes behind his head, major bleeding.
Trayvon Martin with bruised knuckles and 1 close range gun shot to the chest.
If you believe Zimmerman chased down Trayvon and Trayvon was merely defending himself you would be hard pressed to explain how Trayvon kept hitting Zimmerman when he was on his back. It is not self defense when you are trying to finish someone off, which is what Trayvon was doing. You say Zimmerman is lying. By law if there are two equally plausible explanations given the evidence and one points to guilt and the other to acquittal the jury MUST take the acquittal route. If you don't like the zimmerman story, you don't have an alternative. Not a single witness stepped up and said they saw how the fight started.
Zimmerman does not strike me as a cold blooded killer. For a picture of cold blooded killer look at the scum that set the building on fire and killed firefighters. Zimmerman is simply a wannabe cop who almost got himself killed by playing one. He saw someone he never saw in his neighborhood before and decided to confront him. Given the history of burglaries in the area, he was well within his rights.
IShop tries to reason with trend. too damn funny.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Quote from gwb-trading:
You better read the autopsy report that stated very directly that Trayvon had bruised knuckles.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/tra...-—-potentially-supporting-zimmermans-defense/
Maybe you need to stop making up your own facts... and evaluate the existing facts (aka reality) in the same way that a jury would before spouting opinions publicly.
Quote from IShopAtPublix:
He got suspended from his high school for several days (and trust me you don't get suspended for several days for nothing).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So many in the high school get suspended for 10 days when the school drug test them in random. For marijuana. That is very common.
Quote from trendlover:
That would certainly qualify as unreasonable search.Quote from IShopAtPublix:
He got suspended from his high school for several days (and trust me you don't get suspended for several days for nothing).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So many in the high school get suspended for 10 days when the school drug test them in random. For marijuana. That is very common.
Of course I wouldn't put it past the fascist state we live in, but got any proof of that ?
Quote from IShopAtPublix:
If you believe Zimmerman chased down Trayvon and Trayvon was merely defending himself you would be hard pressed to explain how Trayvon kept hitting Zimmerman when he was on his back. It is not self defense when you are trying to finish someone off, which is what Trayvon was doing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
QUOTE]Quote from IShopAtPublix:[/i
"Finish someone off"
That is what you say. Do you know this is true?
Quote from IShopAtPublix:
"how Trayvon kept hitting Zimmerman when he was on his back"
George say Trayvon hit him 20 times. And George say Trayvon use his hands to cover his mouth too. And George say Trayvon use his hands to get the gun too. And George say he is screaming in the recording too.
How can all that happen?
You can not see Jorge is so full of the shit?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:
That would certainly qualify as unreasonable search.
Of course I wouldn't put it past the fascist state we live in, but got any proof of that ?
Sounds like bullshit to me.Quote from trendlover:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proof of what? The drugs test? Ok, the guardian or parent sign the paper in school to say yes or no to random drug test. If the guardian or parent say no on the paper, the school can go past the guardian or parent and test random if they have "suspician"
And the school not have to tell the guardian or parent who say the student is suspicious. I know that is true because that happen to my brother. And when my brother go to the meeting with the school board to get off the suspension, my grandfather want to know who say my brother is suspicious. The school board tell my grandfather they can not tell him the name. And the person to say my brother is "suspicious" not have to go to the school board meeting to say why he think my brother is suspicious.