And again the same way of thinking. I'd have hoped that ET posting on Politics would start to look to the root causes, instead of just doing exactly what they are "expected".
Few questions :
- Who created Al Quaeda , ISIS and al ?
- Who funded the above with first rate vehicles, arms ( their vehicles costes at least 150k each) ?
- Who has been begging the Syrians to let them get their guys out of areas where Syrians people were held in hostage, when the Syrian army was more powerful ?
- Who has done everything not to bomb bases held by Isis, Islamic state?
It's obvious the Obama colluded with Saudi Arabia and Qatar to create ISIS. He also overthrew Qaddafi in Libya, which destabilized the region and set the stage for the attempted overthrow of the Syrian regime. It was a bipartisan policy, supported by delusional neocons on the republican side like John McCain as well.
However, looking for "root causes" is a waste of time. We know the root cause. Islam is a pseudo-religion of violent conquest. If you admit muslims into your country, an uncertain but not trivial percentage of them will engage in violent jihad. A very significant percentage will support the jihadists, either through funding, safe houses or looking the other way.
There is a obvious correlation between the percentage of muslims in a country and terrorism. Some, like Germans who support Merkel and most euro governments, are prepared to accept that. The reasons are murky, since it would seem to fit the definition of treason.
