More MAGA droppings from Trump University Genius, confuses Origins with Oranges

[The Futures Farmer]

always talking when you should be listening liberals, he did not say father at all “My fuhrer is German, was German,”

 

[The Futures Farmer]

yes, the fuhrer was Austrian. With that and the orange the windmills did give him a brain tumour

 

[maximumpossiblesuffering]

During a bizarre meeting with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, President Donald Trump lied about his father, Fred Trump, being born in Germany and demanded to know the “oranges” of the Mueller report, when he meant to say “origins.”

“My father is German, was German,” Trump falsely stated, as his father was born in New York. “Born in a very wonderful place in Germany, so I have a great feeling for Germany.”

While his direct family connection is false, the president’s father was descended from a German immigrant.

Trump also mistakenly ranted about the “oranges” of special counsel Robert Mueller‘s concluded investigation into his campaign and Russia.

“I hope they now go and take a look at the oranges, the oranges of the investigation, the beginnings of that investigation,” Trump said, before correcting himself and asking for the “origin of the investigation.”

He proceeded to opine that “the only thing that’s disappointing to me about the Mueller report” was the lack of focus on “the oranges — how it started.”

As for his claims about Fred Trump, the president has overstated his family’s connection to Germany in the past.

At last year’s NATO summit in Brussels, Trump said insisted he has “great respect for Germany — my father is from Germany.”

https://www.mediaite.com/online/tru...ys-oranges-instead-of-origins-multiple-times/

But according to the official White House transcript, released almost five hours later at 6:47 pm, Trump didn’t say “oranges” at all, he said “oringes,” and he only did it twice:

And I hope that this investigation now, which is finished — it’s totally finished. No collusion. No obstruction. I hope they now go and take a look at the oringes [origins] — the origins of the investigation, the beginnings of that investigation. If you look at the origin of the investigation — where it started; how it started; who started it, whether it’s McCabe or Comey or a lot of them; where does it go; how high up in the White House did it go — you will all get Pulitzer Prizes, okay? You’d all get Pulitzer Prizes. You should have looked at it a long time ago.

And that’s the only thing that’s disappointing to me about the Mueller report. The Mueller report, I wish, covered the oringes [origins] of how it started — the beginnings of the investigation and how it started. It didn’t cover that. And for some reason, none of that was discussed.

Presumably, someone at the White House concluded that it’s less embarrassing for Trump to have made up an entirely new word that swaps letters and adds an “e” to “origins” than for him to have said “oranges” three times, which is what actually happened.

https://www.mediaite.com/donald-tru...ranscript-claims-he-said-oringes-not-oranges/

Depressed and scraping the bottom of the barrel again to ease your pain? Already missing the Mueller Investigation?

Trump will continue to be the President of the United States for at least two more years and what little material you had on Trump was either old or fake. Now that you have used up your material, what's next? Repeating your old stuff like a sitcom over and over again? Actually, you have been doing just that for quite some time now, haven't you?

Perhaps you should visit Hillary and offer her a foot message and conversation on the good old days.

In the meantime, I will work out whether low frequency sound waves in resonance can cause tissue heating and thus increase probabilities of cancer.

 

[exGOPer]

Depressed and scraping the bottom of the barrel again to ease your pain? Already missing the Mueller Investigation?

Trump will continue to be the President of the United States for at least two more years and what little material you had on Trump was either old or fake. Now that you have used up your material, what's next? Repeating your old stuff like a sitcom over and over again? Actually, you have been doing just that for quite some time now, haven't you?

Perhaps you should visit Hillary and offer her a foot message and conversation on the good old days.

In the meantime, I will work out whether low frequency sound waves in resonance can cause tissue heating and thus increase probabilities of cancer.

Yea, it's my fault that I posted an article where your supreme leader was spouting off like a moron making shit up and then was unable to pronounce a simple English word. Why won't I write about Hillary instead of focusing on the current news about a rapidly progressing dementia patient with a low intellect and penchant for incest like most rural Cons.

 

[Cuddles]

 

[maximumpossiblesuffering]

Here we go... another angle of attack on Trump. You guys should read the short story: "The Little Boy Who Cried Wolf".

 

[exGOPer]

Here we go... another angle of attack on Trump. You guys should read the short story: "The Little Boy Who Cried Wolf".

You are talking about Hillary going to jail as announced by Trump or your whining only applies to the Mueller investigation whose findings are behind covered up?

 

[maximumpossiblesuffering]

You are talking about Hillary going to jail as announced by Trump or your whining only applies to the Mueller investigation whose findings are behind covered up?

For some reason, I am feeling you want to have a more serious discussion about Hillary. Ok, I'm game. Since I have joked, poked, and bantered before on this site, I will provide a bit of an overlay of my beliefs through my personal ranking of recent US Presidents before giving my own specific opinion on Hillary.

My top US Presidents are John Kennedy for his handling of the Soviet Union in the Cuban Missile Crisis. Bill Clinton for his hard work, hard play attitude and ability to work with the other side. Donald Trump for his much needed leadership in addressing repressed businesses, men, whites, Obama executive orders, job and economy unfriendly laws, and a biased media.

My bottom US Presidents are Bush, Sr for his involvement in the Iran Contra Scandal and for using Ronald Reagan as a figurehead for his unethical conduct as Vice President. G.W. Bush for his systematic dismantling of American ideals such as torture when not absolutely necessary and the Patriot Act. Barrack Obama for Obamacare, illegal foreign influence and campaign contributions, mass installation of party operatives in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and using increased regulation as a political device to control businesses.

As you can see from the above, I am not strongly tied to a particular political party, even though I am a long term registered Democrat.

The Republicans used Monica Lewinsky to setup Bill Clinton in a sex scandal for political gain. Then they went after him for obstruction for lying to Congress. Yes, Bill had sex and lied about it, but given Republican conduct in setting it up, it is hard for me to respect them. Fortunately, the American people saw through this and Bill Clinton's popularity soared. However, the Republicans were not done yet. Through law enforcement, they were able to change the status quo on lying and obstruction of justice charges. Before Bill's impeachment hearing, it was rare for someone to be charged with lying to an officer. Afterwards, it was not. I have no illusion on whether Republican Party is "best buddies" or not with the American people.

Now to Hillary. The Republicans went all in to destroy her credibility by any means possible. Perhaps this was in part an attempt to get even after Bill got the best of them and of course to further their own political agenda over any other consideration. Unfortunately, Hillary seemed to have internalized these attacks as apparently shown by her increasing bitterness and repeated lashing out at large groups of people. Most notable was her "Basket of Deplorables" statement. Early on, my feeling towards Hillary was lukewarm on ideas that "at least we get Bill again". It is unfair to say, it seems, but even there Hillary would be living in a man's shadow. Bill's shadow. Hillary definately had an interest in Leftist politics early in life as shown by her thesis. My fear was she wanted to retaliate against a large group of people for her being wronged on the basis of a few bad actors.

As far as seriously wanting to see Hillary in jail? No, I don't. Like with anyone else, where there is significant and credible probable cause that a serious crime took place, it should be fairly investigated by nonpartisans. Upon conviction, fines and appropiate restrictions on political office or attorney qualifications are in order. As far as jail may be concerned, in Hillary's case, she may deserve credit for time served based on the conduct of the other side.