More deadbeats about to lose their (free) housing

Meet The Monster Of The Housing Market: Presenting "Vampire REOs" In Which 65% Of Americans Live Mortgage-Free

Link

Over a year ago, in addition to the money-laundering aspect (confirmed previously) and the REO-To-Rent scramble by PE firms and hedge funds (which is now over as PE become active sellers of apartment rental properties), we highlighted the third implicit subsidy to the housing non-recovery: Foreclosure stuffing. We explained this scheme by banks to limit the amount of available for sale inventory as follows: "since the properties not entering the foreclosure pipeline are effectively kept out of inventory, even shadow inventory, and thus the distressed end market, the monthly drop in foreclosures has acted as a form of subsidy to the housing market, as month after month less inventory than otherwise should, enters the market.... What this has resulted in is a logical increase in prices of the properties that are on the market." Today, the mainstream has finally caught on, and courtesy of RealtyTrac has come up with its own name for this subsidy: Vampire REOs.

In a press release overnight, the foreclosure tracking service RealtyTrac, observed that a stunning 47% of bank-owned homes are still occupied by their previous owners who were foreclosed on, creating "vampire REOs."

Vampire REOs are bank-owned homes that are still occupied by the previous homeowner who was foreclosed on. On the surface these properties often will look like normal, non-distressed homes, but beneath the surface they represent a shadow inventory that is becoming more imminent as rising home prices motivate banks to sell off these homes to try to recoup their losses on soured loans.


The vampires are particularly acute in Miami (64%), Houston (65%), Los Angeles (61%) which have nearly two thirds of bank-owned properties falling into the "vampire REO" category. This means that in order to generate a housing scarcity, millions of deadbeat Americans have been given a carte blanche to live mortgage-free, in some cases for years, and in a state of default in their existing homes, as the banks have no incentive to actually clear out the properties to which they have title, making home purchases for everyone else - those who have the funds and are willing to purchase a home - impossible due to artificially los supply and artificially high prices.

Putting the problem in perspective, Emmett Laffey, CEO of Laffey Fine Homes International said that "The New York metro area is experiencing a spike in mortgage defaults, however, there are very few vacant foreclosures or bank-owned properties that are languishing on the market." “Typically these types of properties are sold well within 30 days of hitting the market,” he added. Except when they never make the market.

Of course, now that home prices have been artificially boosted courtesy of just this foreclosure process "stuffing", "banks likely wish to sell these homes sooner rather than later as home prices have been rising" predicts RealtyTrac.

However, therein lies the dilemma: since the primary driver of home price appreciation has been fake scarcity, either due to Vampire REOs or Zombie foreclosures (the far more traditional homes that are still languishing in the foreclosure process but have been vacated by the homeowner being foreclosed), the second that banks unclog the foreclosure pipeline exit and begin selling this uber-shadow inventory, the entire facade of the fake housing non-recovery will begin to crumble as one after another bank scramble to hit the highest bid possible, before some other bank does so.

Expect the broader mainstream media to begin reporting on this phenomenon in another 6-8 weeks, about the time when the Y/Y increase in home prices is solidly rolling over, and the usual 18 months delay behind Zero Hedge.

Finally, those curious to see how many foreclosed homes are being occupied mortgage free in their metro area, the following interactive chart from RealtyTrac has the answer.

http://www.realtytrac.com/Content/n...ket-vampire-reos-and-zombie-foreclosures-7892
 
My guess is that most of these houses are under water. If the owners had equity in them, the banks would have foreclosed to grab it. It is cheaper for the banks to let the owners live in them rent free than have to deal with maintaining an empty house. There are probably some accounting issues as well about when the banks have to write down the loan and take an earnings hit.
 
Quote from AAAintheBeltway:

My guess is that most of these houses are under water. If the owners had equity in them, the banks would have foreclosed to grab it. It is cheaper for the banks to let the owners live in them rent free than have to deal with maintaining an empty house. There are probably some accounting issues as well about when the banks have to write down the loan and take an earnings hit.

The banks DID foreclose. They just didn't complete the foreclosure process in many of them.

After FASB suspended Mark to Market in 2009, banks didn't have to mark down the value of underwater houses until they were sold. So, of course, they kept them on their books as assets at the original purchase price, hoping that price would come back (and knowing it would when the Fed printed with reckless abandon). Once they sell the house, however, if it is at a loss, they have to recognize that loss then.
 
Quote from AAAintheBeltway:

My guess is that most of these houses are under water. If the owners had equity in them, the banks would have foreclosed to grab it. It is cheaper for the banks to let the owners live in them rent free than have to deal with maintaining an empty house. There are probably some accounting issues as well about when the banks have to write down the loan and take an earnings hit.

There is also the reality that evicting a non-paying owner takes a lot of time in most states. In North Carolina the average time for a bank to evict a owner who they have foreclosed on is just short of two years (with legal challenges, paper-work, etc.). And we are one of the 'quicker' states.

We had a lady in our neighborhood (a divorce case) who lived in her house nearly three years before she was evicted after foreclosure. She made a few legal filings to slow down the eviction, but otherwise did not spend much time/effort to live payment free for multiple years. And she loudly bragged about it.
 
On a related note:

Time > Business & Money > Real Estate

What Ever Happened to the Big, Bad ‘Shadow Inventory’ of Homes?
By Christopher Matthews @crobmatthews Jan. 22, 2013

"One of the great economic success stories of 2012 was that the housing market finally found a bottom, and even began to show signs of a nascent recovery. But even as positive data on the real estate market began to trickle in early last year, not everyone was convinced. The main reason for skepticism were millions of homes that had not yet hit the market, but probably would soon — either because they were already in foreclosure or because the homeowners were so far behind on payments that foreclosures were imminent. These properties, which last year were estimated to range anywhere from 3 million to 10 million in number, were dubbed the “shadow inventory” of homes."

More>>
 
Quote from Ricter:

On a related note:

Time > Business & Money > Real Estate

What Ever Happened to the Big, Bad ‘Shadow Inventory’ of Homes?
By Christopher Matthews @crobmatthews Jan. 22, 2013

"One of the great economic success stories of 2012 was that the housing market finally found a bottom, and even began to show signs of a nascent recovery. But even as positive data on the real estate market began to trickle in early last year, not everyone was convinced. The main reason for skepticism were millions of homes that had not yet hit the market, but probably would soon — either because they were already in foreclosure or because the homeowners were so far behind on payments that foreclosures were imminent. These properties, which last year were estimated to range anywhere from 3 million to 10 million in number, were dubbed the “shadow inventory” of homes."

More>>

Ricter showing his unwavering support for the rentier class.
 
Quote from denner:

Ricter showing his unwavering support for the rentier class.

Hypocritical, to the last. Bad mouth the rentier class when it manifests itself on the right, downplay and support it when it is on the left.
 
Back
Top