More crazy bull from Chump

Nonsense. It has worked brilliantly for Japan and China. It made tiny little England a wealthy powerful country.

If the jobs being offshored were university professors, DC lawyers and lobbyists and CEO's, you would be getting a different story about the glories of free trade.
This. These are the facts

Mercantile trade policies built super powers in Asia and Europe.

But it "won't work" for America.

More bs.
 
Widgets? You fucking mental midgets talk out of your ass. We need to burn this fucking trade deal shit to the god damn ground and start over. There is one country, ONE F'N COUNTRY that can survive a trade war. That would be us. One country, ONE F'N country that can ride out a trade freeze. That would be us. Why? One very simple but crucial commodity. Food! No one, not one of these fucks can produce what we do. No one, not one can feed themselves long term. They'll starve by the tens of millions, and I mean literally starve, and that's not something you can wait for the next quarter to fix. I say we bring this whole god damn world to their fucking knees.
 
http://www.businessinsider.com/the-us-is-the-most-protectionist-nation-2015-9

"There is one country that imposes more protectionist measures than any other.

It isn't China, Mexico, or Japan. It is the US.

That is according to a report from Credit Suisse on globalization. The bank pulled numbers from the Global Trade Alert to show which country has introduced the most protectionist measures. These are policies that restrict trade, often for the sake of helping out local and national businesses by holding back foreign competition....."


KhgLJ8l.png
 
http://www.businessinsider.com/the-us-is-the-most-protectionist-nation-2015-9

"There is one country that imposes more protectionist measures than any other.

It isn't China, Mexico, or Japan. It is the US.

That is according to a report from Credit Suisse on globalization. The bank pulled numbers from the Global Trade Alert to show which country has introduced the most protectionist measures. These are policies that restrict trade, often for the sake of helping out local and national businesses by holding back foreign competition....."


KhgLJ8l.png

They forgot two minor details:

Tariffs
Currency devaluation.

Which is all u need. Another lie of omission job likely to push an agenda out of credit Suisse.
 
They forgot two minor details:

Tariffs
Currency devaluation.

Which is all u need. Another lie of omission job likely to push an agenda out of credit Suisse.

For a reason.

"Tariffs directly restrict the flow of goods and services by making them less price competitive and were more prevalent prior to the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) regime that began in 1995.

"Tariff rates in Eurasia are the lowest, thanks to freer cross-border trade promoted by the European Union. The dawn of the millennium brought with it a preference for non-tariff barriers, as the WTO actively discouraged the levy of tariffs."

Do you have info that details higher tariffs by the Chinese?

And China is propping up it's currency right now. That's why they've lost a huge amount of reserves in the last few years. If they let the currency go, it would plummet.

I'll just say one last thing. This prevalent notion that thier currency is too cheap by virtue of the fact that they sell a lot of product, and not because their cost of production is a fraction of the US, is absolute bullshit.
 
For a reason.

"Tariffs directly restrict the flow of goods and services by making them less price competitive and were more prevalent prior to the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) regime that began in 1995.

"Tariff rates in Eurasia are the lowest, thanks to freer cross-border trade promoted by the European Union. The dawn of the millennium brought with it a preference for non-tariff barriers, as the WTO actively discouraged the levy of tariffs."

Do you have info that details higher tariffs by the Chinese?

And China is propping up it's currency right now. That's why they've lost a huge amount of reserves in the last few years. If they let the currency go, it would plummet.

I'll just say one last thing. This prevalent notion that thier currency is too cheap by virtue of the fact that they sell a lot of product, and not because their cost of production is a fraction of the US, is absolute bullshit.

I don't have the documentation at my finger tips but it's widely known China and Japan levy all kinds of exorbitant tariffs on imports. While America taxes Asian imports at near zero.

China won MFN status in the WTO a long time ago. Most favoured nation status basically eliminates most tariffs against mfn exports

Most of the yuan depreciation is the Chinese central bank printing renminbi and buying treasuries to keep the usd high relative to the yuan. And yes ur very right about China spending their reserves to prop currency

Same thing with Japan. Boj routinely destroys the yen to keep exports cheap relative to US dollars. Another mercantile beggar thy neighbor economy. Problem is these are #2 and #3 global economies in terms of size who make their living sucking off #1
 
Here is some data on US import/export activity:

Exports

Machines, engines, pumps: US$205.8 billion (13.7% of total exports)

Electronic equipment: $169.8 billion (11.3%)

Aircraft, spacecraft: $131.1 billion (8.7%)

Vehicles: $127.1 billion (8.4%)

Oil: $106.1 billion (7.1%)

Medical, technical equipment: $83.4 billion (5.5%)

Plastics: $60.3 billion (4%)

Gems, precious metals, coins: $58.7 billion (3.9%)

Pharmaceuticals: $47.3 billion (3.1%)

Organic chemicals: $38.8 billion (2.6%)



Imports:

Electronic equipment: US$332.9 billion (14.4% of total US imports)

Machines, engines, pumps: $329.3 billion (14.3%)

Vehicles: $283.8 billion (12.3%)

Oil: $201.2 billion (8.7%)

Pharmaceuticals: $86.1 billion (3.7%)

Medical, technical equipment: $78.3 billion (3.4%)

Furniture, lighting, signs: $61.2 billion (2.6%)

Gems, precious metals: $60.2 billion (2.6%)

Organic chemicals: $52.1 billion (2.3%)

Plastics: $50.2 billion (2.2%)

In 2015 the net trade deficit for the US was 531 billion dollars. i.e. on a net basis we imported 531 billion more in goods and services than we exported.

What would a trade war look like?

Overall we would need to offset $532 billion mostly by increased cost of goods to US consumers. Then we wouldn't be at the mercy of US creditors like China.

1. tax things we import . This means that for the consumer, things we are not good at producing would cost more. e.g. electronics... we import 333 billion in electronics but export only 170 billion. thus in electronics we have a trade deficit of 163 billion. If we tax imports in electronics, electronics will cost consumers more, causing them to buy less and pushing the US towards a more even balance of trade in electronics.

2. Other countries will be forced to try to reset the balance by taxing things we export. e.g. aircraft. The US sells $131 billion in aircraft. Our import rate on aircraft is nil. So other countries will be forced to either tax aircraft purchases or change their sourcing of aircraft. A lot of the US sourcing of aircraft involves military planes (e.g. the F35), but a good deal is also commercial aircraft. When you talk aircraft you are talking Boing but there are other players including Airbus (a European consortium).

http://www.bga-aeroweb.com/firms/Competitors/Competitors-Boeing.html

Generating a trade war would mean increased pressure for countries to switch sourcing of aircraft away from the US.

I could go on with this but you get the idea. When we lose jobs for widget makers we trade those jobs for higher level jobs like Boeing engineers and manufacturing workers. If you are a US widget maker and are not taking part in the US economic success it's because you didn't listen to your high school counselors when they told you to go to college and become an engineer.

If you ARE an engineer you don't back Trump.

If you are not a college graduate and work making widgets you back Trump.

You are left behind... and now you want to solve your problem by electing Trump and resetting the US economy to favor widget makers. This MAY give you a temporary reprieve but only VERY TEMPORARY.

The problem is that there are so many people who have been left behind that it's possible they will win and give Trump the opportunity to fracture the US/world economy so we can make more widgets in the US, lay off engineers at Boeing and allow Airbus and other US competitors to grab high end market share.

The US does not compete at the widget level. This is a conscious choice because becoming a widget making country would make the US a third world rather than a first world country.
You make a false assumption; that is, The US would lose a significant amount of its business if it were taxing exports.
That depends on many quantitative and qualitative factors.
How much tax? Does it vary by country?

Fortunately America isn't China or Bangladesh and the country can still make quality products. At the lowest price? No. but much of the world isn't looking for the cheapest solution all the time.
 
Back
Top