More and more, I'm beginning to believe that a Right Wing mindset is a mental defect

Do you believe that a Right Wing mindset is a mental defect?

  • Yes

    Votes: 17 31.5%

  • No

    Votes: 38 70.4%
  • Total voters
    54
No, that's not what I said is it. Poor comprehension or semantics trolling effort? I never said that the elasticity of GAAP is only now being rigorously exercised. I said that the "ex items" convention is NOW being rigorously exploited at to a previously unprecedented extreme. Of course, you'd actually have to be a member of the financial community to know that.

Further evidence supporting the University study which concluded that leftists do not understand basic economics.

LOL!! Mr. "I've read economics books" strikes again!! LOL!!!

Quote from Gabfly1:

So you think that fiscal year end window dressing is a new phenomenon and that the elasticity of GAAP is only now being rigorously exercised? Gosh, aren't you precious.

The poll enumerates the number of mental deficients who have participated thus far: 25 and counting. Tell your friends.
More...
 
Study A) by reputable university, study B) by leftist no name internet blogger. Hmmm... Guess leftists also struggle to understand basic concept of credibility too... LOL!!!

Sorry, I'm probably too harsh, I know you are still licking your wounds over the whole ex items issue...

Quote from Gabfly1:

Except for the fact that the study you refer to has been outed for the bullshit that it is:

http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/06/are-you-smarter-than-george-mason.html

You just can't get away from the smell, can you? Why do you think that is?
More...
 
Quote from phenomena:

...[backtrack, backtrack, backtrack]...I said that the "ex items" convention is NOW being rigorously exploited...[backtrack, backtrack, backtrack]...
More...
Quote from phenomena:

LOL!!! Yeah, "surging earnings" now that they use this new "ex items" method of reporting...
More...
Why don't you tell us about the "new method" again?

Oh, and you don't believe that ex-items have previously been used to advantage with any rigor? How charming.
 
Again? Seriously?! LOL!!! That would be like the 5th time. You know that, right??? Who is "us"? You are the only one who seems to have trouble understanding.

Why do you think that's what I believe?? It's not because that's what I said I believe. You just made that up...

Quote from Gabfly1:

Why don't you tell us about the "new method" again?

Oh, and you don't believe that ex-items have previously been used to advantage with any rigor? How charming.
More...
 
Here we go, just because I feel bad for confused senior citizens I'll repost the answer-

Poor comprehension or semantics trolling effort? I never said that the elasticity of GAAP is only now being rigorously exercised. I said that the "ex items" convention is NOW being rigorously exploited to a previously unprecedented extreme. Of course, you'd actually have to be a member of the financial community to know that.
 
Quote from Gabfly1:

"Grab lie?" What, your writers are on strike?
More...
You don't like a little variety?

Since you seem to prefer it, and it is more befitting, I'll stick with Gayfly then.
 
Quote from Lucrum:

You don't like a little variety?

Since you seem to prefer it, and it is more befitting, I'll stick with Gayfly then.
More...
With your constant sexual orientation references, it would appear that you're the one who likes a little variety.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top