You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Moonbat Ideology now required reading
- Thread starter hapaboy
- Start date
So we have descended into a flame fest over what happened on 9/11.
How patriotic...
How patriotic...
looks like people in general dont buy the official story:
Polling Data
When it comes to what they knew prior to September 11th, 2001, about possible terrorist attacks against the United States, do you think members of the Bush Administration are telling the truth, are mostly telling the truth but hiding something, or are they mostly lying?
Oct. 2006 May 2002
Telling the truth
16% 21%
Hiding something
53% 65%
Mostly lying
28% 8%
Not sure
3% 6%
Source: The New York Times / CBS News
Methodology: Telephone interviews with 983 American adults, conducted from Oct. 5 to Oct. 8, 2006. Margin of error is 4 per cent.
Polling Data
When it comes to what they knew prior to September 11th, 2001, about possible terrorist attacks against the United States, do you think members of the Bush Administration are telling the truth, are mostly telling the truth but hiding something, or are they mostly lying?
Oct. 2006 May 2002
Telling the truth
16% 21%
Hiding something
53% 65%
Mostly lying
28% 8%
Not sure
3% 6%
Source: The New York Times / CBS News
Methodology: Telephone interviews with 983 American adults, conducted from Oct. 5 to Oct. 8, 2006. Margin of error is 4 per cent.
I guess you missed this reply.....
OWNED again......
BTW, still waiting for YOUR links.....
But you can't provide them can you? Because you're just making it up as you go.....
OWNED yet again....
Quote from Haroki:
No mass, eh?
What about the falling steel? Even if you were right about the concrete turning to dust INSTANTANEOUSLY, wouldn't the steel from the stories above have sufficient MASS to collapse the floors?
OWNED again........
hell no they wouldnt have the mass to collapse in on themselves, they would tip. they have to be cut. how did they get cut? there are beams with 45 degree angles... ummmmmmm... HOW ???? btw, most govt boot lickers have abandoned the pancake theory due to its absudity.
Quote from Haroki:
I guess you missed this reply.....
OWNED again......
BTW, still waiting for YOUR links.....
But you can't provide them can you? Because you're just making it up as you go.....
OWNED yet again....
omg.. you are really this stupid. he is talking about a squib that is maybe 3 or 4 floors away from the actual collapsing... i am talking about one that is 40 floors. no way pressure could make it that far with out popping through a preceding floor.
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:
So we have descended into a flame fest over what happened on 9/11.
How patriotic...
Naaaaah, we don't HAVE to....
But I'm taking a break from fixing my backyard waterfall, and it's fun OWNING a dork like Ratturd.....
But seriously ZZ, what do you think of the dishonesty of misquoting, quoting out of context, and partially quoting the firefighters that were THERE on 9/11?
Don't you think it's politically motivated?
Why else would the CT'ers do that? Can you think of ANY other reason?
Quote from ratboy88:
hell no they wouldnt have the mass to collapse in on themselves, they would tip. they have to be cut. how did they get cut? there are beams with 45 degree angles... ummmmmmm... HOW ???? btw, most govt boot lickers have abandoned the pancake theory due to its absudity.
Prove it....
Link please....