Here we go again, you are beginning to sound like a broken record. So you ran out of things to say and talk of some scam again but provide absolutely nothing to back it up! Are we just supposed to take your word for it?
I have challenged practically everything you have to say but you simply ignore it and call it smoke? Why is that? The difference between my claims and yours is that I have provided references that can be verified, something that you have not! It's quite obvious who is running the scam here.
OK, here is another one. I can see that some guy called "Boss" just had his whole thread wiped from Moneytec, follow this link and see
http://www.moneytec.com/forums/f59/re-thread-removed-question-soul-trader2004-21488/ Why? SoulTraders excuse "We are no longer allowing members to post past performance results unless that member has called each and every one of the trades within the forums and are fully transparent to anyone interested in verifying them here."
Sounds like a reasonable policy to me except that this guy denies it and it's difficult to verify now that his whole thread was wiped! As always, it's very difficult to verify anything coming from you. As he claims, he put 9 months of hard work into it and then finds it wiped off the planet one day.
But anyway, peteuk (that other alias you use) went around promoting some new superdooper signal service the day after surfer's thread was closed. He also went to the newbie threads promoting it and posting links to this thread. Check it out
http://www.moneytec.com/forums/f136/what-happened-my-thread-21382/ If you notice on pages 1, 2 and 3, peteuk and his partners in crime break those very same rules that SoulTrader mentioned above and right before his very eyes. Look on page 1, they claim they would have made +94 pips, then on page 3 peteuk claims "Another good trade this morning for +40" without even making a call. Read the whole thread, there's even accusations of SoulTrader supporting scammers. It's quite typical of Moneytec standards I would say. Snakeoil anyone?
Now, seeing that you've run out of things to say, how about a challenge? I'd like to see proper evidence supporting the following claims you make:
1. "FXsurfer and Pipmaster are one and the same person"
2. "Pipmasterwho purports to be from the UK has in fact never, not once logged in using a UK IP address"
3. "fxsurfer has answered himself many times with many identities - even making one up 'henry Mum to accuse others of being that person"
I've already provided evidence to support my case and I can provide more on request. I have asked how anyone knows that "henrymum was created to accuse others of being that person" when it had never made a post. I also requested the IP address of Henrymum, where is it? So, do you have anything to support your case or is maintaining a lie just too difficult? Maybe we are just supposed to take the word of someone who is constantly linked to scams and scammers? There are quite a few people out there making that claim!
So I'll leave it there for now and I will expect your response to be the same regurgitated rubbish. If that is the case then it will be my pleasure to respond to each of your replies with yet another exposure of "MoneyTec Forums: Abysmal, lowlife snakeoil standards". I already have a few lined up!
Now, are we done?
pip