Money Management Rules Day Trading

And when you know where to place your stop loss - your money management rules/methodology tells you if you have sufficient capital to take the trade and further how many contracts/shares to trade.

Not sure what your argument is here.

Use market to place stop, Kelly to size. Fine. No argument. Can't randomly use Kelly though.
 
I risk slightly more than 2 %. I want to reduce this number eventually.

I stop trading for the day if I take 3 full stops in a row. This would be 9 points per ES contract. My maximum drawdown per day is the same. This rarely happens.

I can also add that on the event that I'm wrong on a trade, I don't typically take a full stop. The stop is there for protection. If I perceive the trade to be wrong after entry, I get out as soon as I can or at the most possible favourable price. Not always easy to do, but it's become more and more of a habit. It's stupid to just wait for a stop to get hit.

If I'm up more than 10,0 ES points per day, I reduce my size to one lots. This is not ideal, but to be honest, there's been a time too many where I've been up greatly on the day and lost much of it later in the day. Ideally, I can trade the entire session from start to end, but now I'm doing it on reduced size after reaching a certain target.

The result of this is that if I'm up say 10 points per contract on a total of 5 contracts, I would need to lose 50 points in order to break even on the day. Excluding commissions for simplicity. The upside is that I can stay in the game and keep practicing.

Thoughts? Comments?

I think answers are within extensive back testing. I am a better scalper than day trader which runners for me is luck that is created by having well back tested systems. Systems average down on all trades. One system quits at end of one loss, another will not take actual trade until sim lose occurs, some increase size when loss occurs. As far as how much to risk comes down to MAE, MFE and price action. If one does not like results, either more rules to take away losing trades or reduction of rules. Breakeven is plus one tick for all systems, though if volume on the dome says unlikely, automation identifies and exit at original entry price. One method was made to take advantage of averaging down to get out at plus one tick on original trade. All systems use 40 point stop loss as catastrophic protective stops, when time expires or price action shows continuation of wrong direction- new target is plus one tick. As a scalper, unwise to use stops too close, price moves so fast at times, don't want to be in exit before entry, LOL.

As years pass and knowledge gained, you come up with many more questions to ask of systems like if chop day, running day, is ES behaving like NAQ or DOW or going opposite of T-Notes, are spreading better opportunity than outrights, size of bars too small or large, is volume too large or too small, times of the day, cycles of the moon, last 4 trading days of the month and first 2 trading days of new month, holidays/holiday weeks(my worst weeks are holiday weeks), is trading non day session better than during the day, is ES acting correctly as the Dax, is Bund acting same as T-Notes, extremes of night session-day session-weekly-monthly-yearly, elections, weather, full moons, major cluster fibs/Gann, inside bars/outside bars, and what is last book so many are reading-where do they get out of losing trades so I can get in, also go by magazine area and see if majority of business mags are very Bull or Bear. And of course a mountain of price action one discovers through the years.

Happy New Year All.
 
that's not stop loss. Kelly criterion is how much to bet. Your stop loss is where to place your "uncle" price.
If you trade fractional Kelly, you trade options and your system has positive expectancy, your can actually set your stop at zero if you own options.
 
To my eyes it is obvious...

"Maximum DAILY drawdown, NO. Maximum DAILY (realized)loss, YES."

It means he does not have a daily drawdown. But he has a daily realized loss limit.

The key is that word "drawdown". Methinks different people define that term differently. I know I do.
I don't like replying to long-forgotten post, but I thought this one warrants a reply.

Whether it's REALIZED or UNREALIZED, you should always nip your loss at the bud before it goes out of control. It's a bad practice (or rather bad faith) to believe that unrealized loss is not really a loss. Sure, price could reverse and you could potentially get it all back. However, the fact that you rode through the loss indicates that you had no idea what you were doing. That loss could have turned into an avalanche and you would have had no other choice but to sell (aka margin call).
 
I think answers are within extensive back testing.

Happy New Year All.

You're absolutely right, Handle123. Correct bet size is dependent on the metrics of your system.

Simply put: the better your expectancy, the more you can risk on each individual trade.
 
I don't like replying to long-forgotten post, but I thought this one warrants a reply.

Well, IMO, if you trade with a hard stop (which you should, unless you have a very good reason such as size considerations to not place an actual stop in the market), there should not be a difference between a realized and an unrealized loss as you're effectively stopped out each time.
 
If you’re gonna day trade (a bad idea for most mere mortals) you’d better automate your trading system - including position risk management.

And since you’re racing highly capitalized private firms with ungodly ECN’s - you will be getting picked off or hung on orders whether you’re using a mouse or an automated strategy.
 
Back
Top