Quote from Ivanovich:
it wasn't me who moved it. But I would make the assumption that it was the third option.
Thanks for your response.
Regarding Censorship of legitimate economic information.
I figured [option 3] that as well as that is the most sensible as far as is
common with people who are not educated regarding these matters.
I am disappointed in how my post was unprofessionally handled.
It was in fact dry, "top official inquiry" level economic investigations.
But global in scope.
I do agree and understand the reasons why other spammers were curbed however.
Plus the over-reactive spammer type ... can be emotional tyrants turning facts into run-a-muck conspiracies ...
Attaching emotion, ego and instability to the facts and materials.
Plus I am aware that volatile materials can cause more harm than good.
I would advise however that your team of Mods remain open to new horizon information.
Often that information sets the stage of change.
Often that information causes people to feel uncomfortable and reactionary.
However that is what cutting edge does to the uneducated, immature and stubborn amongst us.
Energy and Carbon economic and commerce models are likely on the horizon.
I hope from a lack of education that those are not censored as well.
I also hope the mod who moved my post demonstrates
more professional discretion in the future.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/19380