The US government does not control money creation. The FED does it and it is by law independent. The FED's mandate is ""to promote effectively the goals of maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates." "
http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/mishkin20070410a.htm
I don't see where you got that the government is not operationally constrained in general. What you say is correct only during periods of price stability or danger of deflation when the objective of the FED happen to match the needs of the government but it is not a general rule and I do not know where you got that. During periods of inflation for example, the governemnt may be operational constrained by tax revenue alone because the FED will refuse to print money and resort to a restrictive policy. High interest rates may make the issuance of government bonds prohibitive and tax revenue may end up being the only source of funds.
Price stability and danger of deflation are two main reasons of the tax cuts now for the next two years. The FED is accomodating this policy. Surely they expect increased inflation after two years and taxes will go up.
The fifth video in post 102 above is excellent!
perhaps some things need to do concurrently.
1. remove the current budget ceiling in order to use unlimited money that the government wants.
2. use the unlimited money budget to build unlimited infrastructure projects, especially setting up several "trust funds - investing in stocks market" for various objectives, including medical, social security, productivity development, green technology, etc., in order to attain a better than full employment economy within a shortest period of time.
3. spend unlimited money in international development aids for unlimited number of American citizens having US-tax-free status while working overseas countries that were once invaded by the US, as well as some other developing Africa countries that would be most suitable for the Americans of Africa origin.
4. allow unlimited number of wealthy and educated immigrants from overseas, disregarding any race or faith background, to bring in money to buy brand-new houses that are recently built or being built.
5. ...
Never too late!!! LOL
Here’s a Solution for the Annual Debt Ceiling Crisis: Get Rid of It
June 21, 2017
http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2017/06/21/Here-s-Solution-Annual-Debt-Ceiling-Crisis-Get-Rid-it
Lifting the debt ceiling has been a politically onerous task dating back to the 1950s because neither party wants to be perceived by voters as accommodating runaway government spending. That’s ironic because the debt ceiling law has nothing to do with increased spending. Rather, it authorizes the Treasury to borrow money to cover spending already authorized by Congress and the President.
Why don't you, "Lunkhead", read Randall Wray's book "Understanding Modern Money" and decide for yourself. That's a rhetorical question. I know already the answer: Because you can't; it is too deep for you. There is an entire chapter in Wray's book on debasement of money, but you'd have to read the preceding chapters to be capable of absorbing it.
There is an entire chapter in Wray's book on debasement of money, .
Of course I don't mean that. Only a numbskull would think that. There is a entire large body of literature on mmt starting with Keynes on through Minsky and up to and including the present. You have a wide range of literature to select from; take your pick. But please stop acting like a numbskull in the meantime.You mean nobody could possibly understand mmt unless they read a certain person's book?
That's an absurd statement. Why don't you back it up with something other than your personal opinion.And Randall Wray is most definitely not a reputable economist.
https://books.google.com/books?id=V... nothing more than evidence of debt.”&f=false
Scroll down one page to page 47 to find the pertinent sentence, where Wray specifically states that, just as the previous article I linked to stated, Wray denies that gov'ts debased metal coins by decreasing the metal content. He "substantiates" this assertion by claiming 'it would make no sense' for them to debase the coins in this manner.