Quote from bronks:
You're the bearer of the article. It fits your view. You take the heat.
I post a lot of things, some fit my view, some don't, some are just interesting articles.
I find the article interesting, as I find the culture and sub-culture of the NBA interesting.
The number one selling NBA jersey is not MJ's, not Magic's, not KG, or TMac, not Kobe, not Shaq etc.
The number one selling NBA jersey is Wes Unseld, because Wes played for the Baltimore "Bullets" and in the gangster mentality of our young society, wearing a "Bullets" jersey is cool.
Early in this thread, KymarFye was discussing his taste for Kobe's flash and highlights in scoring as preferable to the boring fundamental play of a Tim Duncan.
The NBA is about entertainment, it's "FAN"tastic, and gangster mentality is pervasive in our culture and the NBA markets to it in a subtle manner. Listen to the amount of rap played in pieces covering the NBA compared to pieces on football, baseball, etc.
That ESPN pays a journalist to cover the NBA lifestyle, speaks to audience and the demographics of basketball, compared to say major league baseball, hockey, golf, tennis, etc.
How many "rappers" do we have in Hockey, golf, and baseball? Are golfers "hip" in their fashion sense? Seems like we have a ton of rappers and rapper mentality in the NBA.
The NBA, going back to the days of the NY Knicks with Walt "Clyde" Frazier was the focus of fashion among the players to a greater extent than most other major league sports. Look at the way the NBA players dress compared to the way golfers dress. The NBA is
the gangster sport, and markets this in a very subtle way playing sports in the "hood." Look at the commercials that are about the NBA or have NBA players. Look at the tennis shoe commercials, etc.
I find the "show" of the NBA "showtime" an interesting aspect of the sport, and while Kobe is able to demonstrate physical prowess on the court, while he may drive the same sports cars as the other players, he is missing that "street" element that attracts so many of today's young fans.
The NBA is a sport of style and artistry, not found in the same way as other sports. The pure physical gifts of these great athletes make their "show" on their stage often more compelling putting a ball in a hoop than putting a ball in a hole or over a fence.
The New York Yankees have had a policy of no facial hair. Can you imagine an NBA franchise that tried to restrict their superstars from facial hair or rules on how to dress off the court when they travel together?
MJ was unique in that he was able to capture the imagination of so many different fans, from many different cultures and sub-cultures. MJ has the ability to travel in many different circles, where Kobe seems isolated in his own world, and not one of the "fellas."
Time will tell if Kobe is able to break from the mold he is stuck in.
Sports hero's are an interesting bunch of people. Public opinion about them is fickle, and at the same time enduring. Arnold Palmer, was no where near the golfer Jack Nicklaus was, yet he captured the imagination of fans in a way Jack never did. He was one of the top endorsement for decades beyond his sports greatness, all on the basis of his ability to connect with the audience.
Jordan is the same, has a similar charisma. Kobe doesn't have it, and I doubt he ever will.
It doesn't make Kobe less of a player, but it does make him less of an idol, role model, and fan favorite.
Not saying it is fair, or right. Just interesting.
Like Kobe, if I could be like Kobe????
Personally, and I know people will think it is an anti Laker or anti Kobe thing, but I don't dig Kobe's act on the court. I would much rather watch TMac or A.I. do their "magic" than others.
I was searching some NBA related websites last night and stumbled onto a couple of sites about the Boston Celtics. Man, they were like shrines to the Celtics. A kind of fanaticism from their fan base unlike most other sports teams, and Larry "Legend" was at the heart of the shrine.
During the Larry versus Magic wars of the 80's, we had two very different styles, yet both captured the imagination of the public in their own way. People would argue passionately about who was better, Magic or Larry. Both were great players, both had style in their own way, both were original.
Perhaps Kobe has a style all his own, but I have yet to see it. I just see someone who spent their life dreaming of being the next Michael Jordan, and tries to replicate that on the court. I see very little originality, creativity, personality, or meaning behind Kobe...but that's just my perspective. He may be a great family man and a solid citizen, but he is boring. I don't find him fundamentally solid either given his amount of turnovers on the court.
He may be a superior athlete, but there is little excitement beyond Laker fans when he gets the ball, and the Q ratings reflect that he is not the "man."
Vince Carter won the all star voting this year, and Carter really isn't that great a player right now, and I question his longevity and heart. However, popularity is not based on these in the minds of the fans, as looks better in clothes, is more charismatic, and more entertaining to watch than Kobe for the majority of fans.
Are sports heroes made via a popularity contest? No, but they are remembered and celebrated beyond what happens on the court.
I believe the author of the article understands this reality in his coverage of the NBA lifestyle.
I find the article interesting, and I think if people look beyond the surface of it, they might gain perspective into our culture "outside" the lines of the game.