Quote from jem:
I just consulted some models and experts. The models say under obama' non plan and non leadership and harry rieds b.s. there is a 95% chance of greater debt and continued job loss relative to those seeking jobs. (the 5% is mostly discounting a war)
The same model says that through growth the Romney plan will decrease the budget and create 12 to 15 million jobs in the next few years.
Why the JEM plan balances the budget and returns us to full employment in 3 years.
Any chance of posting data from your models and experts? Glad to hear you out Jem. I understand if it's just speculation, which is fine.