Mitt Romney Sent Millions to Mormon Church

[Brass]

Quote from jem:

...we see tax cuts and then revenue break out to new highs...

Yeah, sure. The economy is a laboratory with only two variables. The other inconvenient variables noted earlier need only to be ignored. Does this come to mind?

Surely you see the pattern.

 

[jem]

Quote from Brass:

Yeah, sure. The economy is a laboratory with only two variables. The other inconvenient variables noted earlier need only to be ignored. Does this come to mind?

Surely you see the pattern.

talk about commie misdirection and subject changes.... I did not know the truth was that difficult for you. if the economy is so complicated... why the hell did you say tax cuts don't pay for themselves - how the hell would you know where you are on the tax vs revenue curve?

Why don't we talk about the Kennedy tax cuts in the 60s.
Tax cuts happened... tax revenues went up.
Are you seeing facts from which you might draw a hypothesis?

 

[Brass]

Quote from jem:

...Are you seeing facts from which you might draw a hypothesis?

What I see is a pattern in the manner by which you draw your prefabricated conclusions. That was my point. You summarily disregard numbers and facts that don't support your chosen conclusion. Nice segue, though.

 

[jem]

Quote from Brass:

What I see is a pattern in the manner by which you draw your prefabricated conclusions. That was my point. You summarily disregard numbers and facts that don't support your chosen conclusion. Nice segue, though.

pre fabricated because I lived through it and I saw it happen.
Conclusions consistent with the data.
I ignored no facts.

 

[Ricter]

http://business.time.com/2007/12/10/do_tax_cuts_ever_raise_revenue/

 

[Brass]

Quote from jem:

...Why don't we talk about the Kennedy tax cuts in the 60s.

Yes, why don't we? At the time, the top marginal tax rate was cut to double of what what it is now. Get that? AFTER the cut, the top marginal rate was DOUBLE what it is now. It was cut from 90% to 70% at the time. If I am not mistaken, it is 35% now.

How do you like them apples? Or do you prefer oranges? I think it's fascinating how you don't trouble yourself with context. It must be very liberating.

 

[jem]

Quote from Brass:

Yes, why don't we? At the time, the top marginal tax rate was cut to double of what what it is now. Get that? AFTER the cut, the top marginal rate was DOUBLE what it is now. It was cut from 90% to 70% at the time. If I am not mistaken, it is 35% now.

How do you like them apples? Or do you prefer oranges? I think it's fascinating how you don't trouble yourself with context. It must be very liberating.

who are you spinning for?
so again we see - cut taxes- revenues go up.

I am straight up about this. tax vs revenue is a curve.
you were the clown that said cutting taxes does not work.

 

[Brass]

Quote from jem:

...you were the clown that said cutting taxes does not work.

Take it up with the Fed chairman of your choice.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from jem:

you were the clown that said cutting taxes does not work.

Canadian clown to be exact. Remember Thunderpussy/Gayfly1?

 

[jem]

Quote from Brass:

Take it up with the Fed chairman of your choice.

take it up with history - take it up with the facts I just presented.
I don't need to listen to those with an agenda, when I lived through the facts.

Note: the fed has an agenda - Federal income tax and the Fed went hand in glove.