Quote from IShopAtPublix:
Pro tip: Bush economy was a fraud based on the real estate bubble. The worth of that economy was decisively proven in 2008 i.e nothing.
Stores bring in more revenue depending on the product they sell and the elasticity of the product. You can raise prices and make more money (both revenue AND profit) when you have an inelastic product. If republican theories of economics were true it would be IMPOSSIBLE to do so. You can raise taxes and increase revenue to the government if you raise them responsibly.
Taxes are not a magical wealth creation machine. They have to be properly calibrated and left alone.
N.B I rewatched all 1992 debates (3 presidential and 1 vice presidential). It is amazing how the unwinding of the Reagan Bush economy propelled Clinton into office (and ross perot too).
good answer except there are very few products or services with inelastic demand. Plus the hypothetical I proposed implicity ruled out that answer... because I stated... when things are slow.
in other words... when there is slack demand... hence not likely inelastic demand.
==
lets go back to what we know.
britain recently raised taxes on rich... revenues went down.
they axed the tax revenues went up.
Romer... Obama's knows from his own advisor his proposal will not end up with revenue increase.
bush cut taxes revenue went up.
Reagan cut taxes revenue went up
Kennedy cut taxes revenue went up
After the mellon tax cuts revenue went up
Cap spending cut taxes.
keynes even told us... when your economy is stagnant you cut taxes and grow out of the recession.
1. bush the 1st raised taxes and the fed raised interest rates.