But its OK for Trump to make all sorts of comments about other Presidents? As far as I'm concerned, once he started doing that all bets were off.
Mitch McConnell on Obama.... "classless"
- Thread starter vanzandt
- Start date
But its OK for Trump to make all sorts of comments about other Presidents? As far as I'm concerned, once he started doing that all bets were off.
The corona virus and Karma has zapped every campaign talking point of Fox and the Trump administration so they resort to the only tool they have left . . . . . .
make shit up and deflect.
While I would not mind if Trump resigned.
We can and should blame Obama for what his team did.
What he and or his team did is worse than a high tech Watergate plus he had more people involved.
You might not like Trump but what they did to Flynn was unconscionable. Those guys involved need prison time. Setting a guy up for an interview with no purpose but to induce a crime?
Prosecutors and Law enforcement need to be held to a very high standard for all our sakes.
(and I am a pro law enforcement person)
We can and should blame Obama for what his team did.
What he and or his team did is worse than a high tech Watergate plus he had more people involved.
You might not like Trump but what they did to Flynn was unconscionable. Those guys involved need prison time. Setting a guy up for an interview with no purpose but to induce a crime?
Prosecutors and Law enforcement need to be held to a very high standard for all our sakes.
(and I am a pro law enforcement person)
There is little doubt that Putin has shit on Trump and he is doing everything he can to keep a lid on it.
‘Almost impossible to overstate how appalling’ Trump’s arguments are in Supreme Court case
Writing in the Washington Post this Tuesday, columnist Paul Waldman writes that President Trump’s desperate attempts to keep the public from knowing his finances may finally be coming to an end.
This Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments from lawsuits Trump has filed to stop people from seeing his tax returns. While it’s hard to know how the justices will rule, what has been revealed is the “almost limitless scope of immunity” Trump seeks.
“Trump believes he should be excused not just from congressional oversight, not just from criminal investigation, not just from questioning by the press, but even from politics itself,” Waldman writes, adding that it’s “almost impossible to overstate how appalling the arguments by Trump’s lawyers have been. They have claimed kingly powers for the president — that while he is in office he can’t be prosecuted or even investigated. That, they say, applies to both Congress and prosecutors.”
I would like to know the quotes...
how do we know if this is TDS speaking.
1. Mueller agreed no prosecution in office.
2. I think Politicians tax return should be private as long as they turn over all investment data... in my opinion.
So just because we believe he can't be prosecuted in office... because that is what impeachment is for... does not mean we believe in kingly powers.
So I would want to read exactly what they argued so I could make my own determination.
how do we know if this is TDS speaking.
1. Mueller agreed no prosecution in office.
2. I think Politicians tax return should be private as long as they turn over all investment data... in my opinion.
So just because we believe he can't be prosecuted in office... because that is what impeachment is for... does not mean we believe in kingly powers.
So I would want to read exactly what they argued so I could make my own determination.
You're a total idiot. Total.
Yeh sure. In fact Comey went over to directly confront the president with the "fact" that he/the fbi/intel agencies had russian pee pee tapes. Comey of course did this to try to extort the president into not firing him- by using the old J. Edgar Hoover technique which was to attempt to let every power player D.C know that he had dirt on them but everything was okay because they would keep it secret as long as they were there.
Now we learn/knew from the beginning that Comey himself had no corroboration of that "fact" and had nothing but statesments from his underlings saying that their was nothing to support that allegation.
But, that's fine. You just keep playing the game by yourself with your collection of made up stuff about what Putin has and does not have on Trump. The last ten scams your ilk promoted have not worked out. What's one more.
Michael Steele
✔@MichaelSteele
https://twitter.com/MichaelSteele/status/1260272854836424705
I'm sure Mitch is aware that a grown ass black man who happens to be a former president has agency to speak his mind on how his successor is managing this crisis, especially since his successor has yet to keep "his mouth shut" about him.
And "classless"?https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/497239-mcconnell-obama-should-have-kept-his-mouth-shut-on-trumps-coronavirus …
So, here we have an educated man, elected to very high governmental positions and he reverts back to "grown ass black man" speak? WTF is wrong with these people. Yeah, I said these people.
Michael Steele
✔@MichaelSteele
I'm sure Mitch is aware that a grown ass black man who happens to be a former president has agency to speak his mind on how his successor is managing this crisis, especially since his successor has yet to keep "his mouth shut" about him.
And "classless"?https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/497239-mcconnell-obama-should-have-kept-his-mouth-shut-on-trumps-coronavirus …
So, here we have an educated man, elected to very high governmental positions and he reverts back to "grown ass black man" speak? WTF is wrong with these people. Yeah, I said these people.
Obama is beginning to sweat bigtime and has an immediate need to discredit Trump and see that he is not elected for reasons that have absolutely nothing to do with with covid.
There is a "crisis" brewing for Obama that is not necessarily brewing for the rest of us.
I see that all the alleged Watergate Prosecutors have a real boner for weighing in on Flynn's case to the point where they want amicus status.
I wonder if their Watergate knowledge will cause them to want to weigh in on the growing evidence of Obama's involvement in Obamagate. I am going to guess not. Or rather, that they will weigh in but it will be to defend Obama.
You mean he's not conforming to your preconceived expectations? How daunting.