Quote from libertad:
How many students are in this category ? The costs of housing and eating are very real as well.....
E Education...Internet based education is absolutely essential to all countries....
The 2nd generation of the internet must make available equal and fair educations no matter where the student sits....
The very same student could go to MIT....study the very same text.....and make the very same grade.....
And at the end of the day.....the student who was labeled as a MIT resident will get the job over a non MIT resident....
This is bullshit.....The job should be based on pure qualifications....not fraternity memberships.....
To suggest that elimination of on site tuition is a step in the right direct....but is simply not efficient enough....and not fair enough....
Also the financial coffers of MIT will dramatically improve....in that lots of smaller amounts of money....add up to lots more total money....
MIT is simply a strong franchise.....Using the very same textbooks....one will pay a little more for an E education by MIT than a lessor franchise name....
Educational facilities should compete against each other like any other business.....
It is not right to make one child pay more than another....
E Education is the correct solution.....
...............................................................................................
The US has the best chance for structural change.....and will quickly become an unbeatable superpower with account surpluses if the following takes hold....
E Education
Eliminate the IRS....consumption tax only....
Eliminate legal largesse
Enhance Electronic stock exchanges
Make medicine a non business
E government...eliminate the sound byte commercial advertising system....
Don't think so ?.... THINK AGAIN.....
Lib, you know I respect you, but the problem lies in the assymetry of the solution. While opening up courses at MIT, etc... to anyone on the internet is great, and certainly promotes a true meritocracy, those students in the USA are subsidizing the rest of the world who can simply leapfrog over them by avoiding the extreme fixed costs.
We see this to some extent with foreign health care professionals who can enter the US health system and earn similar salaries without having to pay back the massive student loan debt of americans. The kicker, of course, is how the system has come to depend upon them. Once exchange rates become less favorable, or salaries do not offer any competitive advantage over their own country, there is no question that they will simply pack up & leave, leaving the american taxpayer who paid much of their salary, underserved.
This has not been well thought out. Too assymetric.