Ok, even by that chart, income is down to 1995 levels, and declining. Wonderful.
But, but...we've have record disparity in wealth!!
Do you give Obama credit for that, too?
Ok, even by that chart, income is down to 1995 levels, and declining. Wonderful.
Yes, bad recession this last time. Still, up long term.Ok, even by that chart, income is down to 1995 levels, and declining. Wonderful.
Do you? He raised taxes on the wealthy, right?But, but...we've have record disparity in wealth!!
Do you give Obama credit for that, too?
Yes, bad recession this last time. Still, up long term.
![]()
Artificially inflated by easy money? Ok, take a look at all data for this index.
He's chosen an arbitrarily short interval. Looking at the chart you can see that this time is not the first time wages have been "stagnant". Just like the LFPR, "it's down under Obama!!" Yeah, it's down under a lot of guys, and it will be down under the next president, too. Until immigrants pick up the slack I suppose.So, just to be clear, O'Reilly mentions that wages are stagnant, you say they aren't. I show they are, and you show they are, but not stagnant by some arbitrary long term you're picking. Do I have that accurately?