Mississippi, Kentucky, Georgia, Ohio, Alabama passing 6 week abortion ban bills

I thought women are equal as men and women are as strong as men, according to the left. Why do they need a special treatment?

My ideas are not outdated and it is very immature to accuse me of things that I am not going to do.

The universe has a law called the Law of Kamma. Committing abortion is a sin. And this law never gets outdated.
Which Christian academy were you "educated" in, or were you home schooled?
 
I love this cliched shit..
sharply dividend....
fiery dissent



and I really love this one... from a justice herself no less.

“Presented with an application to enjoin a flagrantly unconstitutional law engineered to prohibit women from exercising their constitutional rights and evade judicial scrutiny, a majority of Justices have opted to bury their heads in the sand,” Sotomayor wrote.

----

If it so flagrantly unconstitutional why are you writing a dissent?
Its is obviously not flagrant...
Your confused, again. It is the Texas Law that is Flagrantly Unconstitutional, according to Sotomayor; not the majority opinion, which represents inattention to duty with significant repercussions.
 
The Congress must Codify Roe and Direct that the Statute be non-reviewable. [This would send a well-deserved chill through the Court and make it clear which body is Constitutionally Superior. ]
 
The Congress must Codify Roe and Direct that the Statute be non-reviewable. [This would send a well-deserved chill through the Court and make it clear which body is Constitutionally Superior. ]
I don't think it works that way.
 
The Congress must Codify Roe and Direct that the Statute be non-reviewable. [This would send a well-deserved chill through the Court and make it clear which body is Constitutionally Superior. ]
"When we go back to Washington, we will be putting Roe v. Wade codification on the floor of the House, to make sure that women everywhere have access to the reproductive health that they need," Pelosi said in a news conference.

upload_2021-9-3_8-22-41.png



i doubt it's constitutional though
 
meh, they can just host it on a local server if no one will host it for them. Remember Hillary's private server?

It's not the server.... it is the Domain Name Provider (e.g. GoDaddy) that provides the name look-up to the location of the server. This type of anonymous reporting website violates the terms of service for most Domain Name providers. They can host it on any old server they want -- but nobody will be able to look it up & get to it. (Domain Name to IP address lookup).
 
I don't think it works that way.
It can. Check your constitution under duties of the Court. Little known clause. Never as yet used to my knowledge. The concern would be opening a pandoras box, if the other party should ever gain complete control. This is what Gingrich was ineptly referring to when during the republican primary of years past he said, or they (meaning Congress) can just ignore the Court.

The idea that there are three "co-equal" branches is a Myth. The Constitution clearly put the Congress as the superior body to the other two. (Let's not forget the Founders were appointing the Senate; not electing it!) The reality of the executive and Court seizing so much power has always been because of the Congress' insouciance. Congress has the constitutional power to take control whenever they wish but they are now too divided to do anything so dramatic.

This could be the issue however. As even some Republicans realize it is suicide. The red states are going with a plan designed to appeal to the loonies they need to get their governors nominated to run for President, but it will probably make it impossible in a fair election to win in national politics. They are betting everything on being able to control voting. Which, as of now it seems, the Court is poised to let them do, ever since the Court gutted the voting rights act and gave Corporations and political PACs first Amendment rights.

The Court may have already realized that they have placed at risk their perogative to review legislation without oversight by Congress. That perogative was established with Marbury v Madison. Now they have outraged 70% of the American public by ignoring an absurd and ridiculous Texas Law. This matter is not going away until one side or the other gains a clear victory and the matter is put to rest.

I don't think its any exaggeration to say that the character and nature of the nation going forward rides on what happens here.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top