Miss California Assailed By Gays For Defending Marriage
- Thread starter AAAintheBeltway
- Start date
Gay sex, or straight sex, or any kind of sex is in the mind before it is in the body, therefore it is a belief system as to whether or not to opt for one kind of sex over another...
Don't you know that the only thing actually dirty or sinful is the human heart and mind, and not the human body???
Oh, and when there is a discussion of whether someone is able to make an informed decision on sex, it is the mind that is looked at...not the body.
Just because someone is 18 years old physically does not mean that the court would view them as capable of an informed decision on whether or not to have sex with a partner of any kind, etc. as they might have a mental problem that prevents them from being able to make what the court determines is "informed" consent...
It is about the mind, which in your case doesn't work very well...
Don't you know that the only thing actually dirty or sinful is the human heart and mind, and not the human body???
Oh, and when there is a discussion of whether someone is able to make an informed decision on sex, it is the mind that is looked at...not the body.
Just because someone is 18 years old physically does not mean that the court would view them as capable of an informed decision on whether or not to have sex with a partner of any kind, etc. as they might have a mental problem that prevents them from being able to make what the court determines is "informed" consent...
It is about the mind, which in your case doesn't work very well...
Quote from OPTIONAL777:
Gay sex, or straight sex, or any kind of sex is in the mind before it is in the body, therefore it is a belief system as to whether or not to opt for one kind of sex over another...
Don't you know that the only thing actually dirty or sinful is the human heart and mind, and not the human body???
Oh, and when there is a discussion of whether someone is able to make an informed decision on sex, it is the mind that is looked at...not the body.
Just because someone is 18 years old physically does not mean that the court would view them as capable of an informed decision on whether or not to have sex with a partner of any kind, etc. as they might have a mental problem that prevents them from being able to make what the court determines is "informed" consent...
It is about the mind, which in your case doesn't work very well...
This guy's posts remind me of this guy
The "legal bubble" that the State has setup for marriage was established to protect children especially in the event of the death of one spouse. That's all.
Why should we allow two or more adults to benefit from such a legal situation. Does this not discriminate against single adults.
From hereon forward only couples that have children will be called married. Only they will receive full State legal preferences.
All other adults can form legal relationships as they please.
If you work for the government and have great insurance you can auction it off to a partner for top dollar. This would take care of the problem of uninsured very fast.
Why should we allow two or more adults to benefit from such a legal situation. Does this not discriminate against single adults.
From hereon forward only couples that have children will be called married. Only they will receive full State legal preferences.
All other adults can form legal relationships as they please.
If you work for the government and have great insurance you can auction it off to a partner for top dollar. This would take care of the problem of uninsured very fast.
I am sure childless couples will be thrilled to find out that the state has divorced them because of their childless situation...
Your comments are nonsense of course. The legal protection is for survivor benefits (yes, even childless couples), and for the right to make decisions on when to pull the plug, etc.
Having a "spouse" status elevates the person to the level of the rights (or exceeds the rights) of blood relatives...
Your comments are nonsense of course. The legal protection is for survivor benefits (yes, even childless couples), and for the right to make decisions on when to pull the plug, etc.
Having a "spouse" status elevates the person to the level of the rights (or exceeds the rights) of blood relatives...
Why not pick and choose the legal benefits you wish.
Its done now with prenuptials.
In your world you would allow marriage for any reason for consenting adults. If one adult wanted to get married to sell his health insurance rider, that same person may not want to give that spouse power to pull the plug.
As much as Homo's want to pretend State marriage is about affirming a loving relationship, it only exists to apply legal benefits.
that is some of the most disjointed shit I have ever read on the internet.
I hope this is not sort of manifesto against statutory rape laws. Sex with children is sick and it is wrong and it is an unpardonable sin in my opinion. (perhaps God will forgive but society should not)
I hope this is not sort of manifesto against statutory rape laws. Sex with children is sick and it is wrong and it is an unpardonable sin in my opinion. (perhaps God will forgive but society should not)
Quote from OPTIONAL777:
Gay sex, or straight sex, or any kind of sex is in the mind before it is in the body, therefore it is a belief system as to whether or not to opt for one kind of sex over another...
Don't you know that the only thing actually dirty or sinful is the human heart and mind, and not the human body???
Oh, and when there is a discussion of whether someone is able to make an informed decision on sex, it is the mind that is looked at...not the body.
Just because someone is 18 years old physically does not mean that the court would view them as capable of an informed decision on whether or not to have sex with a partner of any kind, etc. as they might have a mental problem that prevents them from being able to make what the court determines is "informed" consent...
It is about the mind, which in your case doesn't work very well...