<img src=http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_fmQuAW1gKXM/SLTZSxlsX6I/AAAAAAAAA3Y/RSkTa2NdenU/s400/anti-homophobia.jpg>
Miss California Assailed By Gays For Defending Marriage
- Thread starter AAAintheBeltway
- Start date
Wow, so many victims here! I got tears flowin' for the poor bastard who had his legal rights to avoid bacteria trampeled on. My heart's broken for the poor fuck that had his right to avoid anything repulsive completely smashed! Who's the equivalent of Jackson and Sharpton for these guys? We gotta get em some help.
You have fallen for the Homo's agenda. Homo's have all the rights under civil unions but they are desperate to have the word Marriage applied to them.
Because marriage is a term the includes some sort of love usually affirmed by a religious outfit.
The State does not concern itself with love. Love is not a requirement to get a marriage license.
The Homos want you to think they have love like normal people but in reality Homosexuality is only about dicks & assholes. Two men without sex are called best friends, two men who suck dick are Homo.
Oy vey...
I have no idea what to say to people who are as religiously paranoid, hateful and bigoted as yourself...
Jesus will take care of this in the end...
I have no idea what to say to people who are as religiously paranoid, hateful and bigoted as yourself...
Jesus will take care of this in the end...
Let me just say that I support a Churches right to sanction marriage for whomever they wish.
I also support the right of the government to tax the shit out of the churches that practice discrimination against people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, etc.
Let the Churches have it their way and make them pay their fair share of taxes when they deny gays the right to marry in their religion.
Most gays aren't looking for religious sanctioned marriages, they are looking for the state to grant them equal access and equal rights to marry, which of course is their constitutional right.
If it were not the constitutional right of gays to marry, then there would be no talk by the religions homophobes of a constitutional amendment to prevent gays from marrying.
Separation of Church and State. Gays should be able to marry according to a constitutional concept of basic human rights and a doctrine of fairness for all Americans, and Churches should be able to determine who they will sanction to marry in their Churches..
If the Churches don't want to allow gays to marry in their religion, then they pay taxes. End of story. Put the Churches to a choice: Allow gay marriage or pay taxes. Now what do you think they would do?
The gays who want some Church to recognize their marriage will just have to get over it.
Henry the VIII wanted a divorce and the "Holy" Roman Catholic Church would not sanction it.
So he said "Fuck you" to the Catholic Church, got his divorce, and began a new religion of his own making...
I also support the right of the government to tax the shit out of the churches that practice discrimination against people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, etc.
Let the Churches have it their way and make them pay their fair share of taxes when they deny gays the right to marry in their religion.
Most gays aren't looking for religious sanctioned marriages, they are looking for the state to grant them equal access and equal rights to marry, which of course is their constitutional right.
If it were not the constitutional right of gays to marry, then there would be no talk by the religions homophobes of a constitutional amendment to prevent gays from marrying.
Separation of Church and State. Gays should be able to marry according to a constitutional concept of basic human rights and a doctrine of fairness for all Americans, and Churches should be able to determine who they will sanction to marry in their Churches..
If the Churches don't want to allow gays to marry in their religion, then they pay taxes. End of story. Put the Churches to a choice: Allow gay marriage or pay taxes. Now what do you think they would do?
The gays who want some Church to recognize their marriage will just have to get over it.
Henry the VIII wanted a divorce and the "Holy" Roman Catholic Church would not sanction it.
So he said "Fuck you" to the Catholic Church, got his divorce, and began a new religion of his own making...
Look at the polls, young people support the right of people to love and marry each other no matter if they are of the same or opposite sex...
--------------------------
You're absolutely right, that it what the polls show. BUT when you follow up with a few questions that require a bit more thought than a yes or no answer and how this issue may or may not impact their life, the young people begin to distance themselves very quickly.
--------------------------
You're absolutely right, that it what the polls show. BUT when you follow up with a few questions that require a bit more thought than a yes or no answer and how this issue may or may not impact their life, the young people begin to distance themselves very quickly.
Which leads to the question, why don't gay men enjoy anal sex with women ?
If homosexuality was a product of nature as gay's claim and not choice then why can't they reproduce ?
Is this really open to interpretation ?
Leviticus 18:22: "You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination."
http://bible.cc/leviticus/18-22.htm
Oh goody, goody. A quote from the Bible.
No reason for reason and common sense then...
Can you imagine that maybe some guys like the feel of a pee pee up their poo poo, and a woman holding some latex just won't doo doo?
Are women satisfied with latex between their legs, or do they want the human feel?
No reason for reason and common sense then...
Can you imagine that maybe some guys like the feel of a pee pee up their poo poo, and a woman holding some latex just won't doo doo?
Are women satisfied with latex between their legs, or do they want the human feel?
"You're absolutely right, that it what the polls show."
Thank you, I am right.
Depends on the follow up question...who is asking it, how it is asked, in what particular context, etc.
I am not saying that the younger generation has a greater percentage of people wanting to marry a member of the opposite sex than the older generation.
I am suggesting that the younger generation is a lot more concerned with more important issues...like where do they get a good paying job.
These social issues take a back seat to the more important issues.
Gay marriage is not really an important issue in a struggling economy...except to the homophobes and the gays, who are highly focused on this issue.
Most reasonable people don't care if gays marry or not...only the extremes of this issue, i.e the gays and the homophobes genuinely care.
The middle ground is typically these days, "Whatever gets you through the night is alright..."
Thank you, I am right.
Depends on the follow up question...who is asking it, how it is asked, in what particular context, etc.
I am not saying that the younger generation has a greater percentage of people wanting to marry a member of the opposite sex than the older generation.
I am suggesting that the younger generation is a lot more concerned with more important issues...like where do they get a good paying job.
These social issues take a back seat to the more important issues.
Gay marriage is not really an important issue in a struggling economy...except to the homophobes and the gays, who are highly focused on this issue.
Most reasonable people don't care if gays marry or not...only the extremes of this issue, i.e the gays and the homophobes genuinely care.
The middle ground is typically these days, "Whatever gets you through the night is alright..."