Miss California Assailed By Gays For Defending Marriage

Quote from TraderZones:

So true. There are many conservatives/religious folk for whom homosexuality is a sin, and they have a problem with it. But they are not supposed to be allowed their belief, because the far left basically tolerates diversity as long as it means you agree with their agenda. Anyone who disagrees with gay/lesbian beliefs is labelled as homophobic.

oh god what a dumb post.
there are a lot muslims that say their religion tells them america is evil.Theyre as full of shit as these christian kooks.

The religious nuts used to oppose inter racial marriage.Probably still do in some areas.Same discrimination,different victim.
Why people care whether 2 people of the same sex get married is beyond dumb.

Can 1 of you right wingers tell me how 2 gays getting married impact you?Details please and abstain from referencing some dumb 2000yr old book.
 
Quote from dsq:


Can 1 of you right wingers tell me how 2 gays getting married impact you?Details please and abstain from referencing some dumb 2000yr old book.
Why do you confuse right wingers with bible thumpers ?
How would that impact me ? It wouldn't . I just don't feel that gay union ( coupling ) should be called a marriage as long as they can't , theoretically , produce a child . So as you see I have no problem with lesbian marriages .
 
So a woman who is 75 years old can't marry a man because she can't produce a child?

Or a sterile woman can't marry a man because she can't produce a child?

What kind of inconsistent world do you live in?

What about the woman who doesn't want to have kids, she can't marry a man?


Quote from Hombre:

Why do you confuse right wingers with bible thumpers ?
How would that impact me ? It wouldn't . I just don't feel that gay union ( coupling ) should be called a marriage as long as they can't , theoretically , produce a child . So as you see I have no problem with lesbian marriages .
 
Quote from OPTIONAL777:

So a woman who is 75 years old can't marry a man because she can't produce a child?

Or a sterile woman can't marry a man because she can't produce a child?

What kind of inconsistent world do you live in?

What about the woman who doesn't want to have kids, she can't marry a man?

Why aren't you challenging Obama on this gay marriage dilema?

He shares the exact same view point as Carrie Prejean!!

It's funny how convenient it is for you libs to forget that fact when you want to name call.
 
I already have...

Obama is on the wrong side of the issue for the sake of political capital...

Quote from bugscoe:

Why aren't you challenging Obama on this gay marriage dilema?

He shares the exact same view point as Carrie Prejean!!

It's funny how convenient it is for you libs to forget that fact when you want to name call.
 
Quote from OPTIONAL777:

I already have...

Obama is on the wrong side of the issue for the sake of political capital...

What would the political capital be? That the majority of Americans feel the same about this?
 
Please, tell me that you got at least some training in polysci...

Quote from bugscoe:

What would the political capital be? That the majority of Americans feel the same about this?
 
Quote from dsq:

Can 1 of you right wingers tell me how 2 gays getting married impact you?Details please and abstain from referencing some dumb 2000yr old book.

Can 1 of you "people" who decides to tell others they have no right to beliefs or opinions because you know better than they do

tell me how:

---> a person killing someone else

---> a person raping someone else

---> a person stealing from someone else

impacts you? Details please and abstain from referencing your self-important, personal opinion only.

Since we should not be concerned about others redefining marriage, then perhaps we should let every other rights group, including the people who demand that sex with young children be decriminalized. Who are we to stop a consenting 30 year old from having sex with a consenting 4 year old?

Perhaps we should re-add child sacrifice to the legal system. Cannibalism. After all, if it does not "impact you" then it should be legal !!!

In other words, people are not interested in you deciding how they should believe or think. You are as temporal, irrelevant and trivial as every other person.

Notice? No reference to 2000 year old texts. Your illogic and misguided attempts at asking an intelligent question wobbles on its own two feet.
 
Back
Top