so hinted, I am pretty sure that they will at some point introduce a pay model and/or ads. Or they will integrate it into FB in one way or another.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Microsoft just tossed away $26 billion buying linkedin ....
- Thread starter S2007S
- Start date
so hinted, I am pretty sure that they will at some point introduce a pay model and/or ads. Or they will integrate it into FB in one way or another.
Pay model? Nope...no one is going to pay for a service they received as free from the beginning, not happening.. The reason why people use it is because it's free and because carriers charge $88,000 dollars to send one text when roaming ...once carriers make text free in roaming area there won't be a need for a free texting app
I would pay for it, as much as 5-10 dollars, obviously only if all my friends and contacts still have WhatsApp as well. If they only option in the future is to have an ad supported whatsapp version and a pay version without ads and possibly additional functionality I will clearly opt to pay a bit each month. And I am pretty sure enough others would do so as well. A free version may still exist but it might be ad supported or in any other way generate revenues. One thing is for sure, which is that FB will generate revenues with WhatsApp. Do I like it, heck no, but come on lets be logical for a second, hardly any mass product that started out free is still free without ad support or the like. And if you prefer SMS texting over WhatsApp I am afraid to have to tell you that you will be a tiny tiny minority of such users, which brings us down to either a pay version or ad supported version or both.
I think we fundamentally agree on all issues, and I respect we may disagree on this. I think from a commercial mindset and Google nor FB, nor any other service has products out there that they don't generate revenue or derive other value from. WhatsApp right now is one of the stark outliers. Because WhatsApp has full end to end encryption now FB cannot harvest user data other than basic usage data. Hence the option to derive value in similar ways as Google does derive value from GMAIL is impossible with WhatsApp.
I think we fundamentally agree on all issues, and I respect we may disagree on this. I think from a commercial mindset and Google nor FB, nor any other service has products out there that they don't generate revenue or derive other value from. WhatsApp right now is one of the stark outliers. Because WhatsApp has full end to end encryption now FB cannot harvest user data other than basic usage data. Hence the option to derive value in similar ways as Google does derive value from GMAIL is impossible with WhatsApp.
Pay model? Nope...no one is going to pay for a service they received as free from the beginning, not happening.. The reason why people use it is because it's free and because carriers charge $88,000 dollars to send one text when roaming ...once carriers make text free in roaming area there won't be a need for a free texting app
I would pay for it, as much as 5-10 dollars, obviously only if all my friends and contacts still have WhatsApp as well. If they only option in the future is to have an ad supported whatsapp version and a pay version without ads and possibly additional functionality I will clearly opt to pay a bit each month. And I am pretty sure enough others would do so as well. A free version may still exist but it might be ad supported or in any other way generate revenues. One thing is for sure, which is that FB will generate revenues with WhatsApp. Do I like it, heck no, but come on lets be logical for a second, hardly any mass product that started out free is still free without ad support or the like. And if you prefer SMS texting over WhatsApp I am afraid to have to tell you that you will be a tiny tiny minority of such users, which brings us down to either a pay version or ad supported version or both.
I think we fundamentally agree on all issues, and I respect we may disagree on this. I think from a commercial mindset and Google nor FB, nor any other service has products out there that they don't generate revenue or derive other value from. WhatsApp right now is one of the stark outliers. Because WhatsApp has full end to end encryption now FB cannot harvest user data other than basic usage data. Hence the option to derive value in similar ways as Google does derive value from GMAIL is impossible with WhatsApp.
There is no difference between WhatsApp texting and SMS texting.....I can send the same exact text on what's app as if I'm sending it SMS....$5-10 a month...come on!!! That's a complete rip off....I can use SMS for FREE
Microsoft upped its offer for LinkedIn because of Salesforce
Salesforce, Microsoft and Facebook were involved in discussions about buying LinkedIn, but the social media platformpassed on an acquisition.The competition from Salesforce forced Microsoft to sweeten its offer to acquire LinkedIn to an all-cash $26 billion deal.(Bloomberg)
Salesforce, Microsoft and Facebook were involved in discussions about buying LinkedIn, but the social media platformpassed on an acquisition.The competition from Salesforce forced Microsoft to sweeten its offer to acquire LinkedIn to an all-cash $26 billion deal.(Bloomberg)
Microsoft upped its offer for LinkedIn because of Salesforce
Salesforce, Microsoft and Facebook were involved in discussions about buying LinkedIn, but the social media platformpassed on an acquisition.The competition from Salesforce forced Microsoft to sweeten its offer to acquire LinkedIn to an all-cash $26 billion deal.(Bloomberg)
Fools money is soon parted...