Microsoft just tossed away $26 billion buying linkedin ....

Agree with your main point.
To keep this in perspective, it's $4 a share, so the downside risk of this transaction is pretty clear. After many years of treading water living off their legacy product lines what I had heard is they are doing quite well in newer areas like cloud computing. The premium may be 50% but it's zero premium on LNKD in price only a few months ago.

Yes, it's a huge gamble but maybe not so much for them. What I'm saying is all we hear about on hear is "experts" criticizing everything about companies and deals they know very little about. They are not all failures, as my examples of GOOG, FB, and more recently AMZN illustrate. I'm being realistic, I cannot fathom why FB is doing so well but perhaps the initial forecasts about the power of the Internet in the 1990s are coming true now, just not exactly as people thought, and 10+ years later then people thought. My observation is giants in the industry are doing well, and smaller players not so well.
 
You mean the same app that is used each single day by hundreds of millions?expect ads or a paid version at some point but to be clear 19bn was paid for the user base not a piece of software
WhatsApp that made probably zero profits was bought for a bubble price of $19,000,000,000

Hahahaha......$19 billion for a messaging app ....
Do you know how many brilliant minds you can hire for $19 billion bucks to create the next technological breakthrough and they go out and throw away $19 billion on some lame messaging app....
 
Linkedin is big in India, used as a platform to get new IT-jobs and to have some sort of trust by social networking in a country where trust is hard to come by.

Aquisitions are not bad in and of themselves. Depends what one makes of it.
 
No they are not, but when the company pays a 50%+ premium over the stock price then that is stuffing investors with an acquisition that they could have had much cheaper. Market practice even for high tech firms is a premium of 20-30%. Microsoft hopelessly over-offered and I believe the reason is panic in upper management to be rejected again should they have offered less. So, their own fear got in the way rather than keeping a cool head and simply walking away from a deal should the to be acquired firm reject such offer. It makes no sense.

Aquisitions are not bad in and of themselves. Depends what one makes of it.
 
No they are not, but when the company pays a 50%+ premium over the stock price then that is stuffing investors with an acquisition that they could have had much cheaper. Market practice even for high tech firms is a premium of 20-30%. Microsoft hopelessly over-offered and I believe the reason is panic in upper management to be rejected again should they have offered less. So, their own fear got in the way rather than keeping a cool head and simply walking away from a deal should the to be acquired firm reject such offer. It makes no sense.


If Microsoft had just a bit more time to wait they could have picked up linkedin for less than $25 a share.
 
You mean the same app that is used each single day by hundreds of millions?expect ads or a paid version at some point but to be clear 19bn was paid for the user base not a piece of software


Talking about the user base....yea there might be a billion people who have the app but how many people ACTUALLY use it....and all this talk about ads ads ads. It's 2016, is there any other way to monetize an app or social netowrking site without using ads.....no one wants ads...
 
I agree, LinkedIn was a worthless transaction for them. I just don't get it.


And is it just me, or is $26 billion about $25 billion more than it's worth?
 
I agree, LinkedIn was a worthless transaction for them. I just don't get it.


And is it just me, or is $26 billion about $25 billion more than it's worth?


Yes they overpaid by at least $25 billion.
That's why Microsoft tossed away $26 billion!!!

Over hyped buyout ...they paid an extremely heavy premium.
 
Well.... Contrary to linkedin usage statistics look very good for WhatsApp. I would say almost everyone uses it on a daily basis. Some regions might favor chat apps like LINE but I see everyone using WhatsApp around me almost on an hourly basis if not more frequently
Talking about the user base....yea there might be a billion people who have the app but how many people ACTUALLY use it....and all this talk about ads ads ads. It's 2016, is there any other way to monetize an app or social netowrking site without using ads.....no one wants ads...
 
Well.... Contrary to linkedin usage statistics look very good for WhatsApp. I would say almost everyone uses it on a daily basis. Some regions might favor chat apps like LINE but I see everyone using WhatsApp around me almost on an hourly basis if not more frequently


And how does WhatsApp monetize all those WhatsApp users? I have used it and pay zero dollars or cents ...
 
Back
Top