This is what worries me. You are already changing the rules from how you actually traded. I'm not saying that its bad to have a fixed stop, but this isn't how you did it for some of these trades.I will be tightening up my max stop to $100, so if I really, really blow it, I can still lose 40 trades in a row and still be alive. Of course that would be a really BAD, BAD day though.
I went through your journal to look for the charts where I remember seeing this. I only found 2, but at the same time, you have shown very little charts in comparison to the number of trades. Here are the charts.
As I point out, if trading the full contract, both of these trades went over the $100 loss. So now you need to adjust your stats, if you want to be a little more realistic, but at the same time, who is to say what would have happened after the fact if these trades did stop out, so who knows what the statistics would be.
Now don't get me wrong, your trading for the most part has been stellar, but this one simple rule of using a fixed $100 stop, which you obviously didn't use for this experiment, can have fairly big implications. How many more trades were there like this that went against you more than the $100?
There are also several other charts where you had $20 losers, but this would translate to $200 on the full contract. Clearly losing just $100 would have been better, but the point is that sticking to a firm $100 stop has not been simulated. Trading differently on a full contract vs. how you traded on the micro will have implications on your emotions.