Michigan Forensic Report on Dominion Machines

[exGOPer]

I've read much more than the sample 1-22 paragraphs above.

No, not Norton, he used a purpose built Linux Boot USB with the following tools:

G. FORENSIC COLLECTION We used a built for purpose Linux Boot USB memory stick to boot the EMS in a forensically sound mode. We then used Ewfacquire to make a forensic image of the 2 independent internal hard drives. Ewfacquire created an E01 file format forensic image with built-in integrity verification via MD5 hash. We used Ewfverify to verify the forensic image acquired was a true and accurate copy of the original disk. That was done for both forensic images.

H. ANALYSIS TOOLS 15 X-Ways Forensics: We used X-Ways Forensics, a commercial Computer Forensic tool, to verify the image was useable and full disk encryption was not in use. In particular we confirmed that Bit locker was not in use on the EMS. Other tools used: PassMark – OSForensics, Truxton - Forensics, Cellebrite – Physical Analyzer, Blackbag-Blacklight Forensic Software, Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio, Virtual Box, and miscellaneous other tools and scripts.

Trump won Antrim county with 61% of the vote. He got 62% in 2016. Romney and McCain both won with similar numbers. How are the Antrim results fraudulent if they match up with previous results going back to 2008.

 

[Good1]

Sorry shills, this appears to be just another bullshit claim peddled by the right.

Russell Ramsland, the sole signer on the report, appears to be a former Texas Congressional candidate - https://ballotpedia.org/Russ_Ramsland

Russel Ramsland was in the news a few weeks ago for pushing erroneous claims on some Michigan voting districts having more votes than voters. Begins on the fourth paragraph - https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...s-up-red-flags-michigan-minnesota/6362056002/

In addition, looking for additional context on the situation, it sounds to me like a Republican County Clerk didn't update the system correctly for changes to the ballot and this resulted in the incorrect results being reported. The issue was discovered quickly by the County canvassers as it could easily be identified using statistical analysis. My assumption is that Ramsland is calculating his error rates by comparing the results from a system set up incorrectly to when they recounted with the system set up correctly. https://www.freep.com/story/news/po...release-election-results-dominion/6520916002/

Finally, here's a further interview with Sheryl Guy, the Republican clerk who made the mistake - https://www.record-eagle.com/news/d...cle_404c0e4e-2695-11eb-8517-8fa00b7f3aa1.html

This is gaslighting at it's finest.

Looks like Joe ("little mask") Biden will have to get his own forensic analyst to look at the same exact data if you think this report needs to be rebutted.

Do you know any completely neutral forensic analysts that you could recommend to the Fraud-elect transition team?

 

[Overnight]

I've read much more than the sample 1-22 paragraphs above.

No, not Norton, he used a purpose built Linux Boot USB with the following tools:

G. FORENSIC COLLECTION We used a built for purpose Linux Boot USB memory stick to boot the EMS in a forensically sound mode. We then used Ewfacquire to make a forensic image of the 2 independent internal hard drives. Ewfacquire created an E01 file format forensic image with built-in integrity verification via MD5 hash. We used Ewfverify to verify the forensic image acquired was a true and accurate copy of the original disk. That was done for both forensic images.

H. ANALYSIS TOOLS 15 X-Ways Forensics: We used X-Ways Forensics, a commercial Computer Forensic tool, to verify the image was useable and full disk encryption was not in use. In particular we confirmed that Bit locker was not in use on the EMS. Other tools used: PassMark – OSForensics, Truxton - Forensics, Cellebrite – Physical Analyzer, Blackbag-Blacklight Forensic Software, Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio, Virtual Box, and miscellaneous other tools and scripts.

It's a resume' cover letter full of fluff. MY CV read exactly the same. I am not impressed by all the fancy terms and software labels. It's all the same shit, and it is routine.

Data forensic science my ass.

You do NOT need an MBA from Harvard, a political science degree from Duke, and proof of "working with NASA and MIT (which means, on the resume', that you had a phone call with them)", to figure out how to use Norton disk doctor. Sorry. Not buying it. We did the same shit back in the 1990s, and we didn't flout hyper degrees to try to prove we could do it.


The methodology is FLAWED. All you have is the original disc. If you make copy after copy of the original disc, then you will only reproduce what was on the original disc. Hello?

 

[exGOPer]

Looks like Joe ("little mask") Biden will have to get his own forensic analyst to look at the same exact data if you think this report needs to be rebutted.

Do you know any completely neutral forensic analysts that you could recommend to the Fraud-elect transition team?

Why? Biden doesn't need to cope, you do.

Keep hanging on to the coping so that everyone is reminded everyday that Trump lost.

 

[Good1]

Trump won Antrim county with 61% of the vote. He got 62% in 2016. Romney and McCain both won with similar numbers. How are the Antrim results fraudulent if they match up with previous results going back to 2008.

Read closer. There were apparently three runs. On election night, the tally was way in favor of Biden. The forensics estimates 81% of the votes were flipped in his favor on Nov 3. This is a discrepancy between tallies on Nov 3 compared to two other tests where Trump came out ahead approx in line with your percentage, or more.

 

[Good1]

Why? Biden doesn't need to cope, you do.

Keep hanging on to the coping so that everyone is reminded everyday that Trump lost.

Like i've said, the burden will soon be on Biden to prove he won this election. He already has lawyers. He should get forensic analysts too. I don't see a problem with that so long as Trumps analysts have equal access to same machines at the same time.

 

[exGOPer]

Read closer. There were apparently three runs. On election night, the tally was way in favor of Biden.

We know, an incompetent Republican made an error which was later caught by other people who were tracking the numbers - results later tallied completely with the historical stats. What is even being alleged here? That Republicans are useless and incompetent when it comes to tech? Guilty as charged.

 

[Buy1Sell2]

https://depernolaw.com/uploads/2/7/...n_forensics_report_[121320]_v2_[redacted].pdf

B. PURPOSE AND PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS

1. The purpose of this forensic audit is to test the integrity of Dominion Voting System in how it performed in Antrim County, Michigan for the 2020 election.

2. We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results. The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud. Based on our study, we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.

It doesn't matter. There was rampant fraud in the election and everyone knows it. You have a smoking gun in Georgia with suitcases full of ballots and no one cares about that, so this will be swept aside as well. The country, as we know it, is over, barring some miracle.

 

[exGOPer]

Like i've said, the burden will soon be on Biden to prove he won this election. He already has lawyers. He should get forensic analysts too. I don't see a problem with that so long as Trumps analysts have equal access to same machines at the same time.

Burden will be on Biden because some boomer Republican made an error that was caught by actual analysts?

Your trolling is weak.

 

[exGOPer]

Forensic estimates by a Republican who got lot of things wrong earlier, also wth is forensic 'estimates'. What an oxymoron.

Who cares about estimates when you could hand count the paper ballots?