Lol, I can almost see the foam on your lips.
Michelle Obama No Longer Proud Of America?
- Thread starter AAAintheBeltway
- Start date
And back here in the real world Trump won the election fair and square, will be the next president and there is nothing short of assassination that the left can do to prevent this. There is absolutely zero evidence that the Russians hacked the "election". It does appear that they did hack into the DNC and some democratic e-mails which, much to the chagrin of democrats, exposed Clinton, the DNC and media minions colluding to steal the primary from Sanders, and generally had Clinton trying to defend her propensity for pathological lying. As one would expect Trump delighted in this, but it does not rise to the level of hacking the election process, and everyone knows this including Obama.
The left, still suffering from Bush derangement syndrome, have been totally traumatized by this stunning defeat of yet another piss poor democratic candidate. Having never really gotten over the Gore defeat this unexpected loss has been just too much to process leaving them grasping for any and every excuse to explain things, all to the point of absolute absurdity. While amusing to watch, there will come a time, and right quick, where this will destabilize our government. Whether this is by plan or just shear stupidity, the nation will suffer as we go down the road. I have written before that people should be careful what they wish for. A shit storm is coming.
The facts say otherwise. I know, feelings rule now.
Canadians are all drumpfs!!!!!!! bet you didn't see that one coming, so does that mean we weren't hacked by the Russians? Haven't checked the news today to see if they are still running with it, President Obama said today on tv that they didn't, but I'll wait for the news to get the real story. Enjoy your Canadian ignorance with all your canadian drumpf friends up there, drumpfloser. Trudeau is a Drumpf!!!!
You have no facts, even the president agrees there was no hacking. Fair and square buddy, unless you count Detroit.
LOL...embarrassing.
So much for Putin listening to him
FBI Said To Back CIA Assessment That Russia Intervened To Help Trump Win
Either the WaPo has pulled off another "fake news" stunt, or Obama may be this close from declaring "cyber war" on Putin.
Moments ago, the Jeff Bezos newspaper, whose main mission over the past month has been to pin Clinton's presidential failure first on Russia and then on Vladimir Putin, reported that FBI Director James B. Comey and Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. have backed a CIA assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election in part to help Donald Trump win the presidency, "according to U.S. officials."
If accurate, this would represent a U-turn to the FBI's official position, and would suggest that all three agencies are in agreement on Russian intentions, "contrary to suggestions by some lawmakers that the FBI disagreed with the CIA." Actually, not just some lawmakers: as Reuters reported earlier this week, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), America's top Spy Agency, sided with the FBI which is why today's report is surprising.
Still, things may have changed. “Earlier this week, I met separately with (Director) FBI James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,” CIA Director John Brennan said in a message to the agency’s workforce, according to U.S. officials who have seen the message.
“The three of us also agree that our organizations, along with others, need to focus on completing the thorough review of this issue that has been directed by President Obama and which is being led by the DNI,” Brennan’s message read. Trump has consistently dismissed the intelligence community’s findings about Russian hacking.
In addition to "helping Trump win", the CIA and FBI officials believe Moscow’s other goal included undermining confidence in the U.S. electoral system.
If indeed the three agencies are in agreement, it is unclear what the next step may be. In his message to the CIA’s workforce, Brennan said the administration has provided detailed briefings to lawmakers and their aides since the summer.
“In recent days, I have had several conversations with members of Congress, providing an update on the status of the review as well as the considerations that need to be taken into account as we proceed,” Brennan wrote. “Many – but unfortunately not all – members understand and appreciate the importance and the gravity of the issue, and they are very supportive of the process that is underway.”
Perhaps Obama, who is speaking now, will provide some much needed information on what the US' next steps are.
Either the WaPo has pulled off another "fake news" stunt, or Obama may be this close from declaring "cyber war" on Putin.
Moments ago, the Jeff Bezos newspaper, whose main mission over the past month has been to pin Clinton's presidential failure first on Russia and then on Vladimir Putin, reported that FBI Director James B. Comey and Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper Jr. have backed a CIA assessment that Russia intervened in the 2016 election in part to help Donald Trump win the presidency, "according to U.S. officials."
If accurate, this would represent a U-turn to the FBI's official position, and would suggest that all three agencies are in agreement on Russian intentions, "contrary to suggestions by some lawmakers that the FBI disagreed with the CIA." Actually, not just some lawmakers: as Reuters reported earlier this week, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), America's top Spy Agency, sided with the FBI which is why today's report is surprising.
Still, things may have changed. “Earlier this week, I met separately with (Director) FBI James Comey and DNI Jim Clapper, and there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our presidential election,” CIA Director John Brennan said in a message to the agency’s workforce, according to U.S. officials who have seen the message.
“The three of us also agree that our organizations, along with others, need to focus on completing the thorough review of this issue that has been directed by President Obama and which is being led by the DNI,” Brennan’s message read. Trump has consistently dismissed the intelligence community’s findings about Russian hacking.
In addition to "helping Trump win", the CIA and FBI officials believe Moscow’s other goal included undermining confidence in the U.S. electoral system.
If indeed the three agencies are in agreement, it is unclear what the next step may be. In his message to the CIA’s workforce, Brennan said the administration has provided detailed briefings to lawmakers and their aides since the summer.
“In recent days, I have had several conversations with members of Congress, providing an update on the status of the review as well as the considerations that need to be taken into account as we proceed,” Brennan wrote. “Many – but unfortunately not all – members understand and appreciate the importance and the gravity of the issue, and they are very supportive of the process that is underway.”
Perhaps Obama, who is speaking now, will provide some much needed information on what the US' next steps are.