Quote from phenomena:
Ahh, so a "racist" then, is anyone who criticizes a democrat... interesting...
Quote from Gabfly1:
Hello, how do you like them obfuscating apples? And no, phenomena was not really being ironic. Irony requires nuance. He is much more of a blunt force, and obfuscation can be achieved quite nicely with mere blunting. That's why obfuscation and obtuseness often go so well together. Phenomena couldn't identify irony in a lineup.
Then let me be clear about something as well, because now you're obfuscating, either intentionally or otherwise. The crap that has been lobbed at Obama is quite different from what has been lobbed at Steele, quite apart from the fact that comparing the two men is like comparing apples to oranges. You know that.Quote from Hello:
I have said it before and i will say it again i dont care much for any of these false cries of racism, i think it downplays the seriousness of the charge.
I dont believe the comment about a muppet was racist, nor do i think 99% of the stuff you accuse people of being racist for is racist. But let me be clear about something, you were the first one to start lobbing the bombs at people so their reaction is to nail you on the exact same charge, which i dont think is right either. I guarantee though that most of this would not be getting talked about if you had not accused most of the conservatives on this site(myself included) or in the United States of being racist to begin with.

Quote from Gabfly1:
Then let me be clear about something as well, because now you're obfuscating, either intentionally or otherwise. The crap that has been lobbed at Obama is quite different from what has been lobbed at Steele, quite apart from the fact that comparing the two men is like comparing apples to oranges. You know that.
Second, there does remain an undercurrent of racism. It was once a big problem in this world, particularly in the US as First World countries go, and it didn't magically just go away and disappear. You're far too smart to believe that. It may have become more nuanced, but it betrays itself from time to time. And while it is not exclusive to any one group, it does seem to find its home more so among the conservative Right than elsewhere. This is no secret.
As for my calling you a racist, I never actually did that. I pointed out that I thought you might be because you had frequently and repeatedly defended other posters who were clearly racist and had already been outed by others. I called them flat out racist, because that is what they are. I did not do so with you, as I just noted. I suppose that I should have considered the possibility that you were merely defending their rights of free, if reprehensible, speech, and I should not have automatically grouped you with them. I believe that I had already acknowledged this mistake on my part elsewhere.
I suppose there are two lessons here, one for each of us. Perhaps I should sometimes be a bit more circumspect about what I write, and maybe you should consider the merits of pedantry when it comes to defending full-on racists. (Index Piker comes to mind, however there have been others who have since dried up or been banned.)
Quote from Gabfly1:
Then let me be clear about something as well, because now you're obfuscating, either intentionally or otherwise. The crap that has been lobbed at Obama is quite different from what has been lobbed at Steele, quite apart from the fact that comparing the two men is like comparing apples to oranges. You know that.
Second, there does remain an undercurrent of racism. It was once a big problem in this world, particularly in the US as First World countries go, and it didn't magically just go away and disappear. You're far too smart to believe that. It may have become more nuanced, but it betrays itself from time to time. And while it is not exclusive to any one group, it does seem to find its home more so among the conservative Right than elsewhere. This is no secret.
As for my calling you a racist, I never actually did that. I pointed out that I thought you might be because you had frequently and repeatedly defended other posters who were clearly racist and had already been outed by others. I called them flat out racist, because that is what they are. I did not do so with you, as I just noted. I suppose that I should have considered the possibility that you were merely defending their rights of free, if reprehensible, speech, and I should not have automatically grouped you with them. I believe that I had already acknowledged this mistake on my part elsewhere.
I suppose there are two lessons here, one for each of us. Perhaps I should sometimes be a bit more circumspect about what I write, and maybe you should consider the merits of pedantry when it comes to defending full-on racists. (Index Piker comes to mind, however there have been others who have since dried up or been banned.)
Then you and I have very little further to discuss and agree upon regarding this matter. Both phenomena and Lucrum, whom you mentioned, have been nibbling at the edges with relish. First, let us agree that racism is discrimination or prejudice based on race. Against this background, consider this little gem from Lucrum as merely one example that managed to escape from him:Quote from Hello:
...I still have yet to see anything from lucrum or Phenomena which would constitute genuine racism...
Here is the post it its entire context for your reading pleasure:Quote from Lucrum:
...any comments of mine about blacks have NOTHING to do with their dark skin.
Instead it is their behavior, actions and lifestyle...